The Worst Film Ever

People are voting emotionally.

hyped garbage

Exactly the movie you think it is, but not the movie you want it to be.

It is easy to understand why some creators are attracted to the film noir genre. After all, with its darkness, shadows, deceiving women, tough guys, and all the other elements, make for a satisfying time at the movies. "La senal", on the other hand, fails to create the allure one feels about dramas such as the one depicted in this Argentine film.The main curiosity for taking a look, was to watch Ricardo Darin, a fine cinema actor, making his debut as co-director with Martin Hodara, who worked with the late Fabian Bielinski in his two pictures. The movie was adapted, and in fact it's dedicated to, Eduardo Mignogna, in whose novel it is based. Not having read the book, we have no idea as to how close the film follows the text in which is based.Corvolan, is a sort of private eye, working with a partner, Santana, and whose work involve tailing husbands who are having extra marital affairs, and that sort of investigation. When Gloria comes to see Corvolan with a special assignment, he feels curious as to her motives, but decides to take the case. As Corvolan begins to investigate, a sort of Pandora's box opens to unmask political, as well as criminal figures involved in racketeering and extortion. Corvolan gets much more than what he expected and his liaison with Gloria will prove to be a fatal mistake on his part.It is made clear the year is 1952. The figure of a dying Eva Peron looms behind everything. There are two references in the narrative about her. It all seem superfluous to the story at hand. Mr. Darin and his co-director, have gone for atmosphere rather than substance. Mr. Darin is seen in constant close-ups that don't add much to the viewer's enjoyment; it is almost narcissistic on the part of Ricardo Darin to want to keep the camera on himself most of the time without any satisfying results. Gloria as played by Julieta Diaz doesn't have enough sensuality; she fails to convince she's a femme fatale. Only Diego Peretti, in a straight role fares better in the film.One could blame the inexperience of the star of the movie as it must have been a trying time for him to be stretching himself in front, and behind the camera. One can only wish the actor well and best luck for his next project, and perhaps allow others to direct him objectively in future appearances.

This is the second Argentine Noir film I see this year (along with "The Mudboy") but I think this film has been completely overrated, that leaves much to desired, argumentative but also artistically.The film is basically what we all know form a Noir film: a depressed and decadent detective which nevertheless shows great aptitude for the work; the lady in troubles, rich and mysterious that always seems to be hiding more than what she says, the always loyal and always more optimistic companion and of course "The Mafia," but what I say! If even the junior assistant who handled the car and reveals the photographs appears, well I have seen this on every film of this kind, no surprises here nor will be ahead in the movie. But then the rest of the film is a lot of confusion and turns of the plot quite clumsy, as, for example, the main character that is shown to us as a very Shrewd men and suddenly becomes nothing else but a clueless fool.I believe, however, that the worst sin is perhaps not to take the chance to portray Argentine society in those troubled years, with all that money spent in all those cars an costumes. The end is really surprising, but not because we do not expect that kind of end but, I think, because it is surprising that all ends there.I think the movie tries to show how facts from the standpoint of the main character no matter if the doubts are clear or not.But leaves you with more questions than answers and the impression that the film bite more of what could chew and in the end you keep specking what it is never going to come.Best luck next time for Darin, which by the way gave a good performance but at times it felt into the confusion of his character, Peretti was relatively well in his semi-comic sidekick, but Julieta Diaz steals the screen with a character very much in his step, no vulnerable blonds but a center-minded passionate Brunette.

One of Argentina's most expensive films is a really horrible one, where *NOTHING* works well. The script is extremely boring and predictable, with absolutely no turns as you'd expect in the genre (film noir) it is trying to emulate.The period reconstruction serves NO purpose to the story other than allowing a couple of characters to wear hats. They could have shot it as happening in 2007 and there would not be any difference. Peron, Eva and their politics are mentioned in passing but they play little to no role in the movie. Darin is horribly cast as the main character. His character is often referred as "The Kid", which makes you think that the character was thought and written for someone in his early eighties, and not in his late forties. It becomes hilarious at one point when a seventeen year old calls him "kid".Julieta Diaz, who is a mildly attractive and interesting woman, fails completely like the "femme fatal". She lacks the curves, sensuality, acting and good dialog that made, for example, Kim Bassinger's character in LA Confidential such a classic. Peretti starts really ridiculous with some of the most horrible lines in the film but it is the only of the title characters that manages to save face by the end.The photography is competent but nothing to write home about. There's also several shots that look badly lit and like they were done on video. The soundtrack is an extremely over the top melodic score that would fit perfectly in any soap opera and makes no sense here. For those speaking Spanish, another oddity is that all characters speak to each other too respectfully, never calling themselves by name (but by using "usted", "señor" and their last names). This is even true with those that are clearly old friends. While there's no doubt that in older times there was much more courtesy when speaking, the diction used in this movie becomes ridiculous very quickly.Finally, as far as the title of the movie (The Signal) goes.... everybody will be left wondering, as at no point it becomes clear what that signal is.

I went watch this flick with the expectation of recreating the Argentine of the fifties -an Argentine long forever gone-. I was born at the beginning of the 60's and had the opportunity to meet quite a prosperous country. Quite different from the piece of s**t that military first and politicians afterward (especially the latter), made of it. So, all in all, the film kept me quite expectant in my seat; not that I fulfilled any of my expectations, because -let's admit it- it is incredibly difficult to make such recreation, and it was not done at all. The camera takes are without exception quite narrow, focused on some part of an old building, rarely letting the sky be seen, and on a very nice fleet of collectible old cars (that MUST have been expensive!). But again, let's be fair, only Hollywood multimillionaire budgets can accomplish such thing. Now for the script: The script is quite mediocre. To such extent that it is unpredictable because it just ends at an unpredictable point, a point at which you could have added one more hour of excellent script. This is definitely not "El Aura". "El Aura" -I got comment on it- is film noire at its absolutely best and you should see it. This one... it can be watched. But only if there's something about the film that interests you beforehand. Else pass.