It’s fine. It's literally the definition of a fine movie. You’ve seen it before, you know every beat and outcome before the characters even do. Only question is how much escapism you’re looking for.

All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.

Exactly the movie you think it is, but not the movie you want it to be.

This is one of the best movies I’ve seen in a very long time. You have to go and see this on the big screen.

Sean Kane is forced to resign from the San Francisco Police Department's Narcotics Division when he goes berserk after his partner is murdered. He decides to fight alone and follows a trail of drug traffickers into unexpected high places. Despite the great cast of very talented people such as Christopher Lee 'An Eye for an Eye' was a pretty bland and boring flick cause i really expected more from this. Norris wasn't bad of course and the martial arts scenes were pretty good it's just that the movie was slow and some of the acting not that good either. (3/10)

A policeman and his partner are set-up and ambushed, the partner being killed. The girlfriend of the partner has evidence connected with drug smuggling and is also killed. The policeman Sean Kane resigns his job and gives up his badge and goes after the criminals himself which includes the people who murdered his partner and partner's girlfriend. It ends with lots of shooting and fighting. Sounds good but it is ordinary and at 106 minutes far too long.Chuck Norris is Sean Kane but due to the length of the film unfortunately Norris has to act a lot and he's not a good actor. In the action scenes he is much better of course. Fortunately he is partnered by the murdered girl's father, James Chan played by the legendary Mako who steals every scene he is in. Christopher Lee is a fine villain but he doesn't have much screen time which is a shame. That man mountain Professor Toru Tanaka is also in the film and is threateningly splendid as usual.A passable time-filler but no more. See it for Mako.

Sean Kane (Chuck) is the best undercover narcotics cop in the San Francisco police department. During what he initially believes to be a standard bust, his partner is killed. His classic BYC (Black Yelling Chief) Capt. Stevens (Roundtree) yells at him for a while about his rogue ways, and, without even being asked in the traditional fashion, Kane turns in his badge and gun. But the threat is far bigger than he originally believes, as a reporter, Linda Chan (Chao) is murdered. So Kane teams up with his buddy James Chan (Mako) and the two men work together to get justice, results, or some reasonable combination of the two. But it's not going to be easy, as dapper baddie Morgan Canfield (Lee) is a powerful man with connections, and his right-hand man has some massive right hands, because it's Professor Toru Tanaka playing, as if he could play anything else, The Professor. So Kane and Chan have their work cut out for them, but even in the face of insurmountable odds, Kane never loses his cool, or doubts the fact that "he's a human weapon!" Will an eye be taken for an eye? Find out today...An Eye for an Eye is generally what people think of when discussing early-80's Chuck: it's a little slow, a little dull, but it's steady, solid, and gets the job done. Perhaps the filmmakers didn't trust Chuck alone at this early period in his career, so they loaded the movie up with action fan favorites: Mako, Professor Toru Tanaka, Roundtree, and of course Christopher Lee. Unfortunately, the fight between Mako and Tanaka left a bit to be desired, and Lee doesn't show up until 43 minutes in. He should have been more murderous and sinister. But he does his usual professional job, and his mustache and pipe make him seem so sophisticated. Amazingly, in the same year, 1981, Lee starred opposite none other than Eddie Deezen in another San Francisco-set movie, Desperate Moves (1981). We don't know which was filmed first, but to go from Eddie Deezen to Chuck Norris, or vice versa, is enough to make your head spin.This was the phase of Chuck's career where he had a blonde mop-top and no facial hair. He might be the only man of action to make the sweater-with-a-collared-shirt look seem intimidating. An Eye for an Eye follows the formula of "Chuck chasing a hulking brute who's going around murdering people" template later used for Silent Rage (1982) and Hero and the Terror (1988). While Mako makes a great sidekick, and there are some excellent moves displayed in the fight scenes, there's no conceivable reason why this needed to be 104 minutes. It should have been 90 at most. But then again, this was before ADD had come along and ruined people's attention spans.That's just the thing: as we talked about in our Hero and the Terror review, we're not against slow paces necessarily, but take a comparable action star of the day like Arnie. His personality, accent and charisma can help viewers power through the boring parts. Chuck doesn't have those tools at his disposal. His co-stars ended up falling into some similar ruts: Roundtree ended up playing BYC's again, most notably in A Time to Die (1991). Director Carver apparently had no problem with Chuck's shortcomings and went on to work with him again with Lone Wolf McQuade (1983). From there he did Bulletproof (1988) with Gary Busey and Danny Trejo, and River of Death (1989) with Dudikoff. So his resume of video-store action speaks for itself. Finally, it should be noted that fan favorite Richard Norton is listed as a stuntman, but doesn't appear in the movie, unfortunately.An Eye for an Eye certainly has its moments, but there's some dullness surrounding them, which is a common problem for Chuck movies. Don't hesitate to see it, just be prepared for that.

i enjoyed this Chuck Norris revenge vehicle a lot.there's plenty of action,of course,but there also some funny one liners thanks to Mako,who teams up with Chuck to help take out the trash and provides some much needed comic relief along the way,which is good,because the overall tone of the movie is a fairly dark otherwise.the acting is good enough for the genre,although Christopher Lee is actually better than the material warrants,and elevates the proceedings.the movie is pretty fast paced,with no real slow or draggy spots,so there's no real risk of being bored.at least i wasn't.but that's just my opinion.for me An Eye for an Eye is a 7/10