Just perfect...

Captivating movie !

Amazing worth wacthing. So good. Biased but well made with many good points.

It's a feast for the eyes. But what really makes this dramedy work is the acting.

The first film based on the popular book by E.B. White was good fun, the second film was okay, and you would expect the third film to be the same concept, live action and computer animation combined, but no, the makers opted to go straight to DVD and just have it all animated. Basically it is the summer time and school is out for Stuart Little (Michael J. Fox), the white mouse adopted adopted into the (human) Little family, and he and his brother George (Corey Padnos) are going near Lake Garland to a lakeside cabin to spend a vacation and join the "Lake Scouts". Troopmaster Bickle (Peter MacNicol) is obviously a little inexperienced, so Stuart and George's father Frederick (Hugh Laurie) assists him teaching the kids the various outdoor and survival skills, while Mrs. Eleanor Little (Geena Davis) tries to mend the old cabin. Stuart being small obviously struggles to keep up with George and the other scouts, and getting lost in the woods he makes friends with a skunk named Reeko (Wayne Brady), who has been getting on the nerves of the creature feared by the other woodland creatures, the Beast, who demands food from them. To satisfy the Beast and give himself some time to get away Reeko, being a good liar convinces the Little's family cat Snowbell (Kevin Schon) that he is a guest of a big party with the animals, but of course he is being led into a trap to become a meal for the Beast (Candyman's Virginia Madsen), who turns out to be a lioness. Stuart being brave and having learnt all he needs from the scouts is the only one who can save Snowbell, and Reeko feeling great guilt and confessing his mistake helps him, and in the end the Beast is captured and taken back to the zoo, and the Littles return home after an interesting vacation. Also starring Sophia Paden as Bunny, Rino Romano as Monty and Tara Strong as Brooke. It is good Fox, Laurie and Davis returned to their parts, but Nathan Lane and Jonathan Lipnicki are missing, but it doesn't matter as the story is very predictable, the computer animation is rubbish and looks like a cheap video game or something, and the family feel has lost any previous charm, do not bother with this terrible animated fantasy adventure. Pretty poor!

Stuart Little 3 has flaws. The animation. I don't like the animation. Ultimate Avengers is better. Way better. But Stuart Little 3 has good things about it, too. It starts with the Little family going on a camping trip. They drive there, Stuart has some adventures, and fights "The Beast". No, not the X-Men character, but...well....I'm not gonna spoil it for you! But I'll give you hint of what "The Beast" is. It's not a flounder! So that eliminates all the flounders of the world. What animal could it be? Watch this movie and find out! Now, I honestly thought this would suck, but it didn't. It was a nice little movie that's fun for the whole family. The first two were better, but this one was still a good movie. So just pop it in the DVD player and watch. They might make a Stuart Little 4. Who knows? 6/10.

this movie is for kids ages 3-10. it is not for older children or adults. children in the proper age group will really like this movie as they know the main characters already and the story is at their level. It should not be called the third movie in the series as it is an animated movie not meant for all audiences. My young children enjoyed it much more than their parents. This looks like a trial for a TV animated series and is something you would expect to find on television. It is not a Disney quality movie but it still appeals to young kids who relate to the characters, especially Stuart Little, who is voiced by Michael J. Fox.He does a great job as usual.

as kids story's go,this ones no different-something happens,hero has to fix it(save/find/insert relevant problem here),has abit of trouble on way but alls OK in end-that much am pretty sure can give away without being accused of mentioning spoilers,in fact that could probably describe any child orientated film.If your kids like animated movies,this will make them happy regardless what i think.On other hand though,if they expect anything different on the animation front,they will be disappointed-most of the animation could have been done just as decent(or badly,depending on point of view,) in the 50's,in fact it looks like they may even have had that in mind intentionally when they made it for all i know.To summarize its an OK film for kids but i think they forgot what made Stewart Little films liked in the 1st place,and thats decent animated characters in a real world environment,and since this is all animated i cannot see the same appeal being prevalent.