Just what I expected

Best movie of this year hands down!

It's an amazing and heartbreaking story.

The movie turns out to be a little better than the average. Starting from a romantic formula often seen in the cinema, it ends in the most predictable (and somewhat bland) way.

Disney is a company that always manages to release great animated movies. Both Walt Disney Animation Studios and Pixar are two of the biggest and best animation studios to exist and have put out gems that will last for years to come. With that said though, Disney has released an animated stinker every once in a while. Not every studio is perfect and every company is prone to release a bad movie every now and then and "Planes" is without a doubt, a bad movie. This film is a spinoff to Pixar's successful "Cars" franchise although it's not made by Pixar but rather another lesser known animation studio at Disney and it's obviously a cash grab. How do I know this? Well, the film was initially meant to go straight to DVD, but the executives at the company must have seen dollar signs in their eyes and wanting to squeeze some more money out of parents pockets, decided to release it on the big screen. Big mistake. This film is easily one of the worst animated movies that's been released under the Disney banner in a long time and that's saying a lot given the good movies they've put out recently.A crop-duster named Dusty (Dane Cook) dreams of being a racer. Having been bored of flying in straight lines over fields constantly, he flies to Lincoln, Nebraska with his friends, a fuel truck named Chug (Brad Garret) and a forklift named Dottie (Teri Hatcher), to enter the Wings Across the Globe race and manages to qualify. Hoping to get some training for the big race, he enlists the help of an old fighter plane named Skipper Riley (Stacy Keach) and manages to get Dusty to improve over time except for achieving a fear of heights he has. Yeah, a plane has a fear of heights and the excuse for why he has it is because he never flew over 1000 feet before. Give me a break. Anyway, will Dusty manage to win the race and conquer his fear of heights? Should this movie have stayed being made for DVD and not have been released in theaters? I think you know the answers to both questions.The story for this movie is so predictable and lazy that it might have been written by a script generator. You've seen the story a million times. The dreamer who is doubted by everyone takes on a challenge and comes out on top. It's nothing new. It goes everywhere you think it goes and hits every single point you think it will hit. There's high points and low points. There's conflicts and dramas. There's attempts at comedy that all fall flat on their face. Yeah, I should talk about that as well. This comedy is dreadful. Not one joke and I mean one joke made me laugh. They mostly consist of unfunny puns and juvenile gags that maybe a five year old will laugh at, but will make everyone else roll their eyes. The animation has some good things in it, but not a lot. For something intending to go direct to DVD, the backgrounds look great. They look very photorealistic, are beautifully rendered and are simply wonderful to look at. Just wish the characters looked as good. They looked amateur at best. Fine for a straight to DVD movie, but pretty lame for a film released in theaters. At least Pixar gave some details and scratches to the characters in the "Cars" films. Here they looked like a toy that came fresh out of the box. There's a reason why movies have keen details. The characters are just the clichéd characters you expect to see in the movie. Dusty is the dreamer with the heart, Skipper is the old mentor with a past, Chug is the silly best friend, and Dottie is the sensible friend. It's just a checklist now that has every single character trait possible. However, there are other things that frustrated about the movie. The cinematography was a joke as it was constant zooms and characters always being mostly centered. The editing was rushed and made the film kind of hard to follow at times. And I really have to ask, why did most of the cast accept this movie? I mean apart from the ones I mentioned, other actors include Cedric the Entertainer, Julia Louis-Dreyfuss, Roger Craig Smith, Gabriel Iglesias, John Cleese, and Val Kilmer. Seriously, with a cast like that, I expect a lot better. I'll just say that these aforementioned actors (along with Brad Garret) have been in better animated movies and I suggest watching the other ones they were in than this."Planes" is just a lame movie only made to make money. The story is predictable and lazy, the animation looks amateur at best, and the characters are so generic and have actors that are far better than this movie deserves. There are far better movies out there that have the word "plane" in the title and I suggest you avoid this wrong flight and look at them instead.

This film reminds me of its predecessor, Cars, in many ways. First, they both share the same world where vehicles have human values. But more importantly, it's the story where the main hero tries to reach a great success in the field he loves - racing. But this time, the main hero has perfectly normal values, isn't conceited, and doesn't act like a jerk. But to give him a handicap, the authors decided to make him unsuitable for what he wants, so that being a racer would be very unlikely for him. The film has a very simple logic, it is very predictable, but that doesn't make it lose its charm of an individual fighting against everyone and eventually winning. I was glad to see him win, even though I knew it would end up like that. The humour in the story is rather funny (although sometimes terribly wrong), but I laughed several times anyway, and I'm not a young kid.The characters are all right (some of them seem to have their counterparts in Cars), although there is very strongly distinguished who the good ones are, and who the bad ones are making this story too idealistic. What I personally minded was a full song appearing in a film. To me, it's a complete waste of time, and the film would work without it just as well.To sum it up, you won't get many surprises when watching this, no profound thoughts are included, but if you're looking for simplicity and some fun, or consider watching a film with your kids, Planes is a good choice. I enjoyed it.

Even though 'Planes' has the same style and animation as Pixar's 'Cars' and claims to take place in the same world, the Pixar name doesn't appear anywhere on-screen in it. This little animated film was produced by DisneyToon Studios (Disney's direct- to-video division), but the powers-that-be decided that they could make more money in toy sales if the movie got a theatrical run first. That seems to be the only driving force in this sub-par kid's flick. I expect a decent box office gross, but its blandness might hurt its lasting appeal when it's actually released on home video, like it was originally supposed to be all along.Almost everything in 'Planes' is ripped off from 'Cars', from the characters to the colors and the locations. The movie starts out in a small rural town very similar to Radiator Springs. A crop-duster named Dusty Crophopper (Dane Cook) wants to enter an annual race against the fastest planes in the world. An elderly, crabby war plane named Skipper (Stacy Keach) teaches Dusty how to fly with the help of Dottie (Teri Hatcher), a mechanic forklift, and Dusty's simple-minded fuel truck Chug (Brad Garrett). Sounds a little too familiar, huh?Due to a technicality, Dusty is accepted into the big race and begins his worldwide trek to the finish line. He's opposed by some bad planes who would rather see him crash and burn than finish the race. However, he also meets some other nice racers along the way that help him conquer his biggest fear. You guessed it – Dusty the plane is afraid of heights.Director Klay Hall is primarily known for many episodes of 'King of the Hill'. He does the best he can with the script he's given. The characters don't have a lot of depth and story points are predictable. Voice acting is sub-par as well, with Julia Louis- Dreyfus, Sinbad and Carlos Alazraqui giving the better of the vocal performances. The movie just lacks the Pixar flair for good storytelling. Sure, it has some aviation references and some cute moments here and there, but overall, 'Planes' is just for little kids and is a barely-disguised attempt to get you to buy toys.

One-liner: Underdog wins a raceLets agree to the fact an animation movie will never have grotesque endings or ill-fated showdown. But surely can do better than this movie. Every move in the movie is predictable and it clearly gives away the peeking factor. Surely it is a fun for the kids, but such movies are mass-acclaimed and is watched by almost everyone, so it should better have the moves to cling to such audiences.The visuals, character rendering and story are similar or should i say exactly the same to its predecessor (cars). Coming from such a animation factory surely i'd expected a lot more.Set aside these factors the movie is a one-time watch (even for kids). Next time creators, please add a WOW factor to your movies like pixar or dreamworks