Thanks for the memories!

Just perfect...

It’s fine. It's literally the definition of a fine movie. You’ve seen it before, you know every beat and outcome before the characters even do. Only question is how much escapism you’re looking for.

The story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.

If you've seen any of Jan Švankmajer's work, then you should have an idea of what to expect in his adaptation of Lewis Carroll's "Jabberwocky". "Žvahlav aneb šatičky slaměného Huberta" emphasizes the more disturbing aspects of the story. It's worth remembering that what we now think of as children's stories were not always so cute. Švankmajer's version contains all manner of contorting objects, including a line looking to break free from a maze (what it does at the end might get seen as a swipe at Czechoslovakia's Soviet-backed regime). It's not any masterpiece, but I recommend it, as I do the rest of Švankmajer's work. The Czech title means "Jabberwocky, or Straw Hubert's Clothes".

As the poem Jabberwocky is read out, various toys come to life and dance all around the room and through the furniture. The only thing that seems to be able to stop their fun is a black cat who periodically turns up to overturn them or burst through them.I saw this short film as part of a collection and I was interested in it because I had seen the very recent film Otesanek by Svankmajer and was curious to see what he had been like over 30 years ago – but more of that later. This film opens with the poem Jabberwocky being read out – this I liked because it is a rhythmic and enjoyable little piece. However the visuals bare little or no relation to the words, although this is not a major problem, just something that struck me as odd that the poem should have been selected in the first place. Instead the visuals are an enjoyable mix of toys moving and all manner of weird things occurring; I would have struggled to place this as being Czech if I hadn't known the director but it is unmistakably Eastern European in origin.This to me was part of its problem – that I could recognise it as being Svankmajer's work. Baring in mind that the only other film I saw of his was from the late 1990's, I did have to wonder why the animation looked the same 30 years earlier and why he had not manage to adapt or mature his style over several decades – it is rare to see this as most people grow over the time. This is not so much a criticism as it is an observation but it did distract me from the short for a while.The short itself is interesting but it is all a bit weird ad the animation is not THAT great (even for the period). It is very Eastern European in its rough nature so I guess if that's not your style then don't bother with this. However it is still worth seeing due to the sheer imagination behind it and the number of strange images it throws into your face. It may not be that good but it is interesting and enjoyable in a rough sort of way. The only thing that really bugged me was the fact that Svankmayer seems to have just stayed where he was in the 1970's – but I reserve judgment until I get the chance to see more of his work.

Jabberwocky is one of the apotheosis in the complexity of animation and amount of work. Very atmospheric with strange music and weird old toys from the east of Europa. See it again and again with the same pleasure.Watch the dancing knife, i still ask myself how they do this...

Spoilers herein.Svankmejer's work ranges from the obvious and tedious to the rich and deep. This is his best in my estimation. His entire career can be seen as experiments leading to his feature-length `Alice,' punctuated by unsophisticated, uninteresting social commentary. `Alice' is fatally flawed, however, because he grossly misunderstands the richness of the story.But this project is not so limited. The little known origin of Carroll's poem is his father's membership in a society to `restore' the English language to its Saxon origins by expelling the French influence. Along the way, Dodgson goofed in all sorts of linguistic jokes based on non-specific sounds. It is the first poem whose images aren't bound to the intent of the poet.Svankmejer surfs this territory by making his own touchstones that have no meaning, but which tap subtle controversies and give us subtle traction on which we can build our own film. It is not as expert as the Quay's `Are We Still Married?' which is the very best of this type. But it is the best of Svankmejer.Ted's Evaluation -- 3 of 4: Worth watching.