Strong and Moving!

Simply A Masterpiece

if their story seems completely bonkers, almost like a feverish work of fiction, you ain't heard nothing yet.

The best films of this genre always show a path and provide a takeaway for being a better person.

How the makers of this film were not sued by the copyright holders of Last House on the Left is beyond me. The plot and characters are almost identical to those in the 1972 classic. The fact that this movie credits a story writer seems like a joke.The gore and brutality is quite severe. This is clearly an attempt to make Chaos an "extreme" film along the lines of Salo or Irreversible. However the filmmakers failed to realize that shock without substance or originality is merely a cheep stunt. When a DVD contains a lengthy interview with the producer and director trying to justify why their film has merit and that all the bad reviews are really positive if you read them the right way you know you're in trouble.

I'll state the blatantly obvious: Last House on the Left ripoff, as in up until the ending, it was the exact same story. Horrible acting and dialog. Cheap and unprofessional look and feel. A pointless attempt at movie making.One major problem was the warning before the movie started. Really? I'm not a fan of the phrase "victim blaming," but this was a prime example of it. And the interview with the director and producer further illuminated their stance on blaming the victim. Is it safe to go buy drugs from a stranger? Of course not always. But this doesn't mean that you're going to get killed, and it doesn't mean that you deserve to get killed. People are abducted by people they know well all the time and most people who trust strangers are fine. It's really a backwards, old fashioned idea to perpetuate. It only aids in fueling the idea that you shouldn't help someone in need, which is what they claimed to be against when talking about the person who could've helped, but chose to ignore her.The only saving grace was the ending, but not in the way they intended. At that point I had given up on the movie completely, only to find myself laughing hysterically at the ridiculous chain reaction. I could tell the director and producer were really proud of themselves for delivering what they thought was such an edgy and controversial ending, but it was nothing more than a joke.And the so-called disturbing torture scenes? They were very cheap, unbelievable, and unimpressive. It was a pathetic attempt to shock the audience and it was in poor taste. They chose genital mutilation because they knew it's a taboo and that people are particularly squeamish about it. They took lines from reviews out of context which stated that they were effected by the mutilation to make it seem as though they effectively portrayed emotions. If they were truly setting out to make a cautionary tale, they wouldn't have needed to include these scenes, as they ultimately added nothing to the film.This film is an insult to women everywhere. It portrays them as weak, stupid, and deserving of violence. It makes the statement that women should not seek independence, nor could they hold their own in an altercation. It shows them as sexual objects to be brutalized and disfigured. If anything, this film does the exact opposite of what it claims it's intentions are.

You have to judge this for yourself, do not pay attention to the low rating people are giving this film. I'm giving this movie a 7 rating because it really made me feel like I was there and I didn't get bored or turn away from the screen, accept the disturbing scenes.This movie is worst than Hostel 1 & 2.You need to be fully warned, seriously. This movie made my stomach turn and I'm still disturbed about what I saw and I kind of wish I didn't see this movie. The leader of the pack was extremely vicious and psychotic and played his part to the max. The way he tortured and sexually mutilated these women was bad enough but for it to be be shown in graphic detail in this film was just too disturbing and the violence was worst than any movie I've ever seen.I couldn't even enjoy the scene with Chantal Degroat showing full frontal nudity either, not that she's not a beauty woman. It was just way too disturbing, she's the woman who plays Emily, who by the way is a gorgeous actress who I have to say was extremely brave to even consider doing a part like this.The ending was not a happy ending at all, although I have to say those useless bigoted cops got what they deserve in my opinion, I don't want to say anymore without spoiling the ending.

So can anyone say complete rip off? If you have seen Wes Craven's 1972 film Last House on the Left, then you have pretty much seen this movie. It is almost an exact rip-off from characters to story. There are a couple of things that were added that may make this film be one to watch, but this is totally not an original idea. Even the poster is a ripoff from both the Deranged tag line and The Last house on the Left tagline and nowhere in the credits does it mention Last House or even Virgin Spring, the film that Last House is based on. I know there has to be a copyright infringement buried somewhere with the releasing of this film.