Thanks for the memories!

Great Film overall

Funny, strange, confrontational and subversive, this is one of the most interesting experiences you'll have at the cinema this year.

There is, somehow, an interesting story here, as well as some good acting. There are also some good scenes

I really wish I'd bailed on this film after the first 30 minutes.So we start with a very unhappy marriage -- with a workaholic protagonist -- and end with an unsatisfying and unconvincing resolution. (If the protagonist is meant to be transformed/reborn at the end, shouldn't he at least show a little emotion?)Another reviewer mentioned having to pay attention and perhaps my concentration lapsed a little, but I did wonder at one point whether there was a "Christmas miracle" that saw a wooden baby from a Nativity scene transmogrify into a flesh-and-blood baby. (That, at least, might have explained the wooden performance.)And while I thought the Judge's motivation was reasonably clear, I never understood the Sheriff's. It seemed like the Sheriff was there as a plot device to throw the protagonist together with the Judge (i.e. by slashing his tyres).I suspect the blame lies at the door of a poor script and poor casting, esp. of the protagonist.

This film has lots of themes in it. Most of all it has deal with "finding family", "What is family", and what secrets are worth keeping. Most of all what price people pay for keeping those secrets. This is one of those rare films that you can not multi-task while watching. You need to pay attention to the details otherwise you can easily lose track of people's names and motivations. In this film Bill Ewing's holiday film Christmas Child concerns Jack (William R. Moses), a reporter who has been having a difficult time getting much joy out of his life. Both his wife (Megan Follows) and his job fail to revive his spirits. While he is working on a story in Dallas, TX, he comes across a photograph that gets his attention. The photograph leads him to Clearwater, TX, where he learns about the town's ornate nativity scene and confronts his past and maybe can lead him to a happier future.This film is well made. Its heart is in the right place. I am glad that the makers of this film did not portray "Small Town" USA as bunch of hicks. If you like stories without Hobbits & Super Heroes then watch this. Trust me it is much better than most of those films. This is a nice films for adults. Kids will be bored.

This might have been a good movie, but it just did not feel complete. It didn't feel like all the loose ends were resolved. There seemed no answer to the question of the main character's father. What happened to him? Why did the main character, the reporter, not try to find out about him? After finding out about his birth mother he seemed to have no interest in finding out about his birth father. The movie did not indicate what happened to the birth father. What was the town sheriff so out to get him? There seemed no clear explanation for that other than he didn't want him snooping around. It just left too many unanswered questions.

When Jack went to the courthouse to obtain his birth records, he gave his date of birth as December 24, 1964. When Jack was escorted by the judge to the graveyard/tombstone sight and revealed Carmen's tombstone, the date of her death was December 26, 1963, two days after giving birth to Jack. How could Carmen be Jack's birth mother if she gave birth a year prior to Jack's birthday? And what was the meaning of the picture of the Reverend with two boys? The film lead you to believe that the current Reverend could be Jack's brother. The actors even look alike. Was one of the boys Jack and the other his brother who is the current Reverend?