Blood Redd

January. 01,2014      R
Rating:
2.7
Trailer Synopsis Cast

Mortimer Clark, a forensic pathologist finds himself autopsying yet another teenage girl’s body ravaged and torn by a large canine. The girls all have been slain on the full moon. A werewolf though? That’s ridiculous. But the next full moon is drawing near and another body is expected. Day of the full moon: Lauren Redd, a sixteen year old girl is being forced to spend the weekend with her grandmother. Here she steps into an elaborate trap laid out by a manipulative killer. But when Lauren’s finally cornered, the tables turn and the prey becomes the predator. Now the Redd family will go to any length to protect their daughter and hide their family secret but Mortimer is quickly following the trail that leads to the horrific truth: Werewolves do exist, and they have an appetite that must be satisfied.

Reviews

Alicia
2014/01/01

I love this movie so much

... more
Rijndri
2014/01/02

Load of rubbish!!

... more
Mjeteconer
2014/01/03

Just perfect...

... more
Platicsco
2014/01/04

Good story, Not enough for a whole film

... more
Michael Ledo
2014/01/05

The English title for this film is "Blood Redd" which doesn't let you know it is a werewolf film, but written by punsters who were as talented as the "Joan of Arcadia" crowd. My apologies to the individual who watched the TV series.The film opens with a werewolf scene and we discover that young girls are being found with their crotch chewed out. The police investigator (Michael The) believes the girls are being raped and large dogs are being used to hide the evidence while the pathologist (Christopher Frainza) believes the community may be annoyed by a werewolf issue.The film really centers on Lauren Redd (Stephanie Hullar) hence the oh-so-clever English title. She visits her grandmother (Peggy Ivene) and in one scene is wearing what looks like a red cloak. Albert (Torey Widener) is grandmother's care taker who is clearly not what he seems.I really did like the plot idea, including the way they handled the twist (sorry I mentioned it.) However, the low budget aspect killed the film. The sound wasn't good. The special effects, which we see at the end, were abysmally bad. The sound track which started out fine during the opening credits feel into a tired piano. The acting was below "B" film standard with the dialogue not helping.Guide: The film was made in English. I caught 1 F-bomb. No sex or nudity. Stephanie Hullar gives us a little tease.

... more
kosmasp
2014/01/06

Remember: This is a low budget movie and you should give the movie some slack. Especially at the beginning, it might take you some time to accept what this is. Or the characters in it. One in particular is so cliché it might hurt you watching this. Not as much hurting though as is going to happen to people involved in this.It might not be the best special effects, it might not have the best camera and some of the acting is way off. The script and direction has its flaws too of course. But I and some of the reviewers here are giving it the benefit of the doubt. It tries to tell a story and it does a decent job. Only if you give way as mentioned before. Not a masterpiece by a mile

... more
Reem Yassin (reembxoxo)
2014/01/07

For those who can't appreciate a film without the high-budget, car explosions, bells and whistles, go watch some other mindless blockbuster... This film has an exceptional cast. This is a beginner film— LOW budget! This must be kept in mind... they don't have Spielberg's connections or financial means. Great acting and craft reflects well regardless.Excellent job, everyone involved in this film. This was very creative and well-done! As a film-buff, I found this film to be quite refreshing. The directorship was unique and original, and I appreciate the cinematography, in general! The film itself is wonderfully chilling and mesmerizing. Some parts were also comical. The cast is credible and all did great in their respective roles. Torey Widener was particularly excellent in his performance. I am very excited for future projects!

... more
sacdalysimon
2014/01/08

I would mirror the other reviews on here Yes it really is that bad . wooden acting actors wait for there Que to then deliver there lines ,terrible terrible sound audio goes quiet then loud and sometimes cuts out altogether,picture quality is horrendous as others have said like a 1980's American TV 480 by 576 ntsc then converted into pal if you are from a pal country you will know what i mean, plot and story written by a college student and also the camera work as well ,the only star i can give is for the very limited special effects and they weren't CGI . if this was done by a college student then it would be a good effort and would probably be granted an A but for a feature film its a U for ungraded .

... more