Better Late Then Never

I like movies that are aware of what they are selling... without [any] greater aspirations than to make people laugh and that's it.

To all those who have watched it: I hope you enjoyed it as much as I do.

This is a small, humorous movie in some ways, but it has a huge heart. What a nice experience.

In sunny California's Los Angeles area, clean-cut white youth gang members are ready to retaliate against a rival Hispanic gang. Later, a friendly police officer tries to talk a young Spanish-accented boy out of continuing his life of crime. Alienated in an "unfriendly" environment, the boy narrates this short drama. It's a social consciousness effort by Sid Davis and Arthur Swerdloff. Most likely, this was shown to 1950s schoolchildren in an attempt to fight juvenile delinquency. Those who've seen the 1961 musical "West Side Story" will notice plot similarities. That show was staged in 1957, and was first proposed as about similar Los Angeles gangs. Among other things, it had Sharks, a concerned officer, an integrated dance and "happiness" in the form of Natalie Wood. "Growing up in an angry world" is repeated as the story's main problem. There are no songs, but "Gang Boy" provides a solution in caring for younger siblings and finding common ground. The film is definitely not art, but it does effectively make its point.***** Gang Boy (1954) Sid Davis, Arthur Swerdloff ~ Curly Riviera

And they lived happily ever afterwards. A rather simple minded allegory of bored youth evolving into gangs. Outside of a Catholic mass there appears to be no external influences. No family. No school. No female temporizing of male spirits. Eventually the stilted intervention of the police, like the apostle Paul to the misguided flock of Ephesus, turns unexplained badness to equally unexplained goodness. Yet in its earnestness I see no better explanation of gangs today - a rather sad commentary on the male psyche steeped in pointless machismo. The documentary is unfortunately marred by a total lack of cultural, economic or sociological explanation. The redemptive ending is as predictable as it is puzzling.

The people who made this short film were very sincere and tried to make a nice film about the evils of gangs and how everyone can just get along. The problem is that even though the film uses real gang members and was in some ways a positive thing, the production is so badly made that it made me laugh! I assume you'll probably feel about the same.One problem with the film is some of the acting. In particular, the cops could barely read their lines and sounded quite robotic. However, the supposedly poignant scene about the boy dying by falling off the cliff--that was amazingly bad! It's OBVIOUSLY a dummy being tossed own the hill and looks just horrible--so bad that you might think it was meant as a joke!! I am sure gang members that were shown this film thought is was hilarious--and you really cannot blame them. A truly awful public service film that was dated when it was made.

Based on a true story that took place in California. There is a Mexican gang and a white gang who hate each other with a passion. They're going to have an all out war to see who's better. The police hear about this and talk to Danny the leader of the Mexican gang to try to prevent it. The movie goes back in time and shows how,and why, the Mexican gang started. Then it comes back and shows Danny making a decision. It all leads to an unbelievable but predictable happy ending.Back in 1954 this must have been hard-hitting. Fights between interracial gangs were not shown in movies at all. Seen today it comes across as obvious and simplistic. They used real gang members to play the roles of the kids to add authenticity...but they were horrible actors. There was some very obvious overdubbing and the "fights" were obviously staged and ineptly done--it's pretty obvious that none of the kids were hurt. Still this movie is well intentioned and shed some light on a subject that most Americans didn't know about. For that alone I give it a 6.