It's hard to see any effort in the film. There's no comedy to speak of, no real drama and, worst of all.

It is not deep, but it is fun to watch. It does have a bit more of an edge to it than other similar films.

Good films always raise compelling questions, whether the format is fiction or documentary fact.

The thing I enjoyed most about the film is the fact that it doesn't shy away from being a super-sized-cliche;

"The Rajah's Casket" is a rather strange little film directed by Gaston Velle and produced by Charles Pathé in 1906. According to one of the other reviewers, the surviving footage is fragmentary and most of the movie does not survive. That's understandable because while the story seems complete, it is rather straightforward and is over in just a couple minutes (not including the rather lengthy section with the dancing girls) so I can see how there could be some missing scenes in between.The story deals with a sorcerer who comes to a Rajah's castle and makes off with the Rajah's casket of the title. He makes his getaway on a dragon (which looks pretty much like a cardboard cut-out, which is totally lame, but at least they blew smoke out of its mouth, which looked nice). A couple henchmen go after the sorcerer and get the casket back--and destroy the sorcerer in the process. And, for whatever reason, the dancing girls come out of the casket!The surviving print, while incomplete, is also poorly colored and sometimes not colored at all. I'm going to guess that this was one of Pathé's full-length features, maybe originally 10 or 12 minutes. The surviving footage is interesting and while the movie is not all there, at least we get the basic story.

Gaston Velle directed this insanely confusing film. There are no intertitle cards, so understanding what is occurring just isn't possible. This was annoying and I am curious how audiences reacted to this back in the day, as I cannot see how they would have understood it either.The action seems to begin in some young rajah's court. I have no idea who he is, but some horned guy on a flying dragon-like creature holding a chest (this must be the rajah's casket...or not). Soon the young ruler and one of his people leave the palace to look for this horny guy. When they find him in the caves, the chest opens and dancing girls pop out. Soon, everybody is dancing and the film ends.Aside from a few nice pieces of trick photography and some hand-stenciled color, there just isn't much to admire in this confusing mess.

Pathe developed a stencil tinting process sometime around 1905 which they felt gave them a competitive edge and made a number of films featuring fantastic scenarios that enabled them to include all number of garish colours to dazzle the audience's eyes. Here we have an Arabian Nights type of story in which a wizard steals a Rajah's casket. The film mixes interior and exterior scenes, and a number of trick effects that were no doubt acceptable for its day but look pretty amateurish today. Then, of course, once the stolen loot has been recovered, we are treated to Pathe's dancing girls. In the print I saw on the internet all the girls body flesh (i.e top of chest and legs) had been crudely painted over in red which was a little distracting to say the least. However, by the time the girls appear the story is effectively over anyway.

I saw an incomplete version of this film in July 1996 at the Cinema Ritrovato festival in Bologna; they screened a 6-minute fragment (from the archives of Cinematheque Suisse) that had no captions. At the beginning of the fragment is a brief shot of a girl holding a card marked "Entr'acte" ... implying that this surviving fragment is the beginning of the film's second half.'The Casket of the Rajah' appears to be a trick film similar to what Georges Melies was producing at this time, but with the atmosphere of the Arabian Nights: I was reminded of Raoul Walsh's wonderful 'Thief of Bagdad' film (which I much prefer to the Michael Powell one, even though I'm a fan of Powell).Judging from this fragment, the entire film seems to be merely a vehicle for illusions and spectacles. An evil magician visits the rajah's palace to perform his magic tricks, but he also steals a valuable casket ... making his getaway aboard a dragon. The rajah pursues the wizard to a subterranean cavern which is full of dancing girls ... well, it would be, wouldn't it?The magic tricks and the special effects in this 1906 effort are all -- by 21st-century standards -- very crude: the wizard's dragon seen here is much less impressive than the one in Fritz Lang's 'Siegfried' only a few years later. What's truly dazzling (in the print which I viewed) is the spectacular hand-tinting. The film-makers had the sense to use this conservatively in the early sequences. When the wizard's magic flame burns red and yellow, the effect is more impressive because the rest of the frame is monochrome. Later, as the wizard escapes on a green dragon (that breathes red flame), the wizard's robes become yellow and pink. Still later, the dancers' costumes change colour as they whirl like dervishes.Although I found this extremely impressive, I was aware of the labour behind it. Women and girls were paid a pittance to ruin their eyesight, painstakingly hand-colouring one frame at a time ... taking days and weeks to create an effect which lasts only a few seconds on the screen. But that effect is very impressive indeed. However, since I saw only a brief fragment of this entire film, I shan't rate the movie.