Although it has its amusing moments, in eneral the plot does not convince.

It is interesting even when nothing much happens, which is for most of its 3-hour running time. Read full review

The storyline feels a little thin and moth-eaten in parts but this sequel is plenty of fun.

A great movie, one of the best of this year. There was a bit of confusion at one point in the plot, but nothing serious.

While keeping a respectable blue collar working man front to his family, Louis Beretti (Edmund Lowe) is in reality a shady mobster who has managed to evade police - until now!! Faced with a stint up the river, a young reporter (razor sharp Lee Tracy) convinces the D.A. to send the jewel thief overseas to serve his country - if he makes good his bad record will be wiped!!It's a film that seems to be lost amid genres - starting off as a "public enemy" tale it then goes to War with Lowe donning his Captain Flagg mantle for a bit of insouciance amid the "war is hell" theme. Arriving back a hero - he decides to go straight so he opens a nightclub (complete with bootleg booze!!) but it takes all his strength to resist his old mob. First he finds out that his sister's husband has been gunned down by an embittered rival and while audience members know instantly who it is, it takes Beretti until the end of the movie and by that time he is up to his ears in hunting down a child who has been kidnapped by his old gang.William Fox with his love of gadgetry and his extravagance saw the merits in talking pictures before any other studio. In 1928 he was buying up theatre chains to equip them with sound, an act that would prove his undoing when the stock market crashed, but it did mean that by 1929 John Ford was backed up to take a gamble filming outdoor scenes. There was still an early talkies "experiment" that required two directors - one a seasoned silent director, the other usually an up and comer. Don't know who directed what on this movie set but it definitely wasn't John Ford's finest hour. As with Edmund Lowe who had still to perfect the debonair man about town persona that he would do so in a couple of year's time. His Beretti is too flip with not enough feeling and he is not helped by Catherine Dale Owen, surely the world's worst actress!! She was noted for her beauty but even though she (mercifully) only made a few films her acting didn't improve. She always seemed to me as if she was giving a speech from a podium, even when she was just saying hello!!Definitely the three best actors were Lee Tracy who kept all his scenes natural and terrifically had a pretty big part, Warren Hymer was his usual dependable self as "Big Shot", a childhood pal of Beretti and Frank Albertson in a small part as a wealthy, irresponsible enlisted man - he may have been annoying in a bigger part but as it was his giggling breeziness was just right!!

"Born Restless" is a 1930 gangster film that surely rates as one of the worst gangster films of all time, made even worse when you think of the great gangster films that came out in the early 30s – "The Big House" (1930), "Little Caesar" (1931), "Public Enemy" (1931), "The Beast of the City" (1932), "Scarface" (1932), etc.The version I saw had the worst sound of any film I've viewed, so this added to the problem.Edmund Lowe plays the star. Lowe was a leading man in the silent era ("East of Suez". "What Price Glory") and he plays this one as if it were a silent film, and given how poor the dialogue is, you wish it was a silent film. He did some good work later on (e.g., "Dinner at Eight", Dillinger") but in this film he is wooden.Lowe isn't the only wooden actor. Almost all the scenes are staged with nary a movement.This is a John Ford production and Ford gets credit as a co-director. It reminds us that while Ford gave us about a dozen of the finest films ever made, he had a lot of clunkers too, and among his finest films I can't recall a gangster film.All things considered there isn't any reason to watch this film. You may be curious, as was I, about viewing an early John Ford film, but give this one a miss and go with "The Lost Patrol" (1934) or "The Informer" (1935).

"Born Reckless" did not strike me as an appropriate title, but the original title of the story from which this movie came was simply "Louis Beretti," even more meaningless."Born Reckless" starts right out with action and even gunshots, but moves rather slowly throughout. But remember, this is an early sound picture, and in that context, it is very well done.Locations range from New York to the World War I battlefield of France and back, from urban New York to the countryside, and the look we get of the era makes "Born Reckless" valuable, if not an entirely entertaining motion picture.It has an excellent cast, with Edmund Lowe the star. He was a good actor but is little known today.However if you look carefully, you will see the biggest star of all time ... but you have to look VERY carefully. In fact, I never did see John Wayne, although he is listed in the "uncredited" cast here at IMDb.Quite visible, although also uncredited, is the great Randolph Scott. Also visible is the great Ward Bond, who is given billing but is on-screen in about two scenes.Known well to John Ford aficionados is Jack Pennick, quite visible also, and whose presence always added so much. Another future cowboy star I didn't see is Bill Elliott, uncredited.Playing the sister of the Lowe character is Marguerite Churchill, who had a couple years before co-starred with John Wayne in "The Big Trail," and it must have been interesting to be on this set with him as an unbilled extra.Lowe's character is not especially likable, and probably the most likable character is the newspaper guy, played by Lee Tracy.The cast alone makes "Born Reckless" very worth watching, even though the story is not very pleasant. It is, though, an interesting look at the World War I and Prohibition era America which, added to the cast, should entice you into watching.I do recommend it, having watched it On Demand from Time Warner Cable. There is a trailer for it at YouTube.

Born Reckless (1930) * 1/2 (out of 4) John Ford drama about a wannabe gangster (Edmund Lowe) who gets busted after a heist but instead of going to prison, the judge makes a deal with him. Instead of jail the man will enlist for WW1 and if he serves his country proudly then the judge will throw out the evidence against him. This all goes well and the man returns home a war hero but he soon learns that his old gang has killed his brother in law so he goes out for revenge no matter what it might cost him. In the end, this film is killed by its standard and routine screenplay, which tries to do way too much and it doesn't do any of them in any original form. The movies tries to mix the gangster genre with a war genre with an added touch of the revenge drama but all three are boring and don't feature anything we hadn't seen countless times in the silent era. I've never been a fan of Lowe but he actually comes off decent here and plays the role off as well as can be expected. The supporting cast, including Lee Tracy, are all standard and forgettable. The climax of the movie is certainly the best thing and Ford's use of a swinging door leads to a great thing but there's nothing else going on here.