People are voting emotionally.

The acting in this movie is really good.

It is neither dumb nor smart enough to be fun, and spends way too much time with its boring human characters.

It's simply great fun, a winsome film and an occasionally over-the-top luxury fantasy that never flags.

I shouldn't have expected much from this film after realizing that the director Penelope Buitenhuis body of work has been concentrated mainly on Lifetime TV movies and TV series. When a film company like Lifetime continually uses the same director there is a reason for it and that reason is that their chosen director Penelope Buitenhuis, can churn out one TV movie after another as I seemingly chew on one corn on the cob after another and they all look, smell and taste exactly the same.There a few scenes between former Brat Pack star Ally Sheedy who plays a high class lawyer and single mom named Melissa Eco and her daughter Abby played by Annie Clark who are in the middle of some heated conversations at home that the sound recording is similar to the effect of the echo that you frequently hear on daytime soap operas.Don't waste your time. Boiling a cob of corn takes only two minutes and it tastes a lot better than this corny soap opera film made for a bored TV audience.

This was not as bad as I thought it was going to be, after reading the review. If it didn't have Ally Sheedy's name on it then I would've given it a miss. I'm glad I didn't.As with ALL movies, there are good and bad points; in this movie, the good outweigh the bad.On the whole, the acting was pretty good. I thought Ally Sheedy did a passable job in the lead role. The scene where she argues with her daughter and breaks down crying, while the teenage Abby (portrayed by Annie Clark) just stares at her with disdain was grating, as Sheedy does get a little bit high pitched. However, I liked the fact that Sheedy's character, Melissa, is a blowhard in court but is not so strong in other situations. This makes for a more realistic development through the film.It was also nice to see Erik Knudsen as a strung out druggie accused of murder. I first saw him in Jericho and thought he would be a talent to watch for.There are times when the writing and direction slips but generally both are sound. I did see the twists coming, but after reading and watching so many thrillers, I'd be upset if I didn't.This is worth a watch if you see it on telly, though I wouldn't recommend spending any money on it.

Body count: 2. One was the victim killed in the movie; the other one was me while was watching this thing. OK, that's not fair, I actually managed to survive this attempt of movie, it's quite excusable. But one more step of absurdity and I might as well be dead from watching it. This is lame TV movie at its clunkiest and I was only watching it because...of reasons unknown, guess you can say I'm fan of someone who has a role in it. In terms of idea borough to the table it does not sound all that ridiculous: tired of defending guilty rich clients who always get away with murder because her defense is the best ever, attorney Melissa Eco (Ally Sheedy) decides to take her time and invest with poor innocent clients who never stand a chance in court. Pro-bono work, obviously, love it when those happen in the movies. Her big chance comes with Greg (Rhys Ward), a young man who is accused of a girl's murder along with his buddy (Erik Knudsen). Greg has it all: he's poor, lived under awful circumstances and to make things even better for the attorney, he's incredibly good-looking, a great image to sell to the jury. But the movie breaks all the suspense by presenting the guy doing the crime, so it's never really a plot twist - only to Melissa - when the angel turns out to be a devil and starts blackmailing his own lawyer. Whoa, you must think. Why? In what world this would benefit him? Well, when the lawyer's daughter is a rebellious teen that resents her mom for all the past wrong-doings and fate or poor writer's decisions but somehow that girl will meet this guy, whose plan is to claim innocence until the end and frame his friend for the crime. I guess you get the general picture from here. Why "Client Seduction" fails? Not just because it's a passable film that doesn't create anything so brilliant. Above all, it's pure sloppy screen writing creating one cringe-worthy scene after another, everything is so hard to believe. My "favorite" unbelievable moments involve the mom's reaction whenever her daughter talks back at her. I know we live in some politically correct times but for the life of me, I just couldn't understand how come she never slapped that ungrateful girl. Not once. All she does is cry and cry, twist her face in a painful manner. Sure, some countries there's laws preventing parents of doing what I proposed but c'mon, that girl needed a wake up call instead of acting rebellious for nothing. She was right in judging the mom for what she did before while defending rich abusers, but the way she conflicts it's just wrong. If the screenplay can afford to be garbage, then there's nothing in the world that can't prevent the actors of doing more wrong...but they do! One disastrous acting after another, it's a weird assembling of actors put together (Sheedy is just cry and scream while Ward doesn't scare with the bad boy vibe cause he's too pleasing for the eyes). But wait, there's one decent performance in the whole movie and it's the real reason why it wasn't so difficult to watch this thing. Kudos to Erik Knudsen. You know, Crash and the Boys in "Scott Pilgrim". I mean, I won't say he stole the show because there wasn't any show to be stolen from anyone here but his tormented, troubled and almost innocent character was engaging in every possible way. It's the only character in the movie that deserves some support from the audience. He was really good. He might be the reason why I'm not so critical of this thing. 4/10