I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much

That was an excellent one.

Just what I expected

The acting in this movie is really good.

Optimistic film about the sad end of our world. The authors fantasize about how the planet can escape from the globalization that destroys it. Film gives the examples of autonomous communities, local economies, implemented or revived ideas that can be effective mechanisms for rescue from the sixth wave of extinction. Which, by the way, the authors categorically attribute to human activities. Researchers' arguments are based on the examples which are not some freak phenomenons, but a very real experience of successful farms, businesses, cities and even countries.From the artistic point of view the film also has a fair value. Temporytm is provided by the interesting plans, offscreen dialogues, unobtrusive infographics and a wonderful soundtrack. Non accidental and very stylish music - is the most successful technical solution that adorns the story.The film is generally bright, shot in light colors, and the characters turn to the audience with a lively optimism, though they are saying that in 100 years we can disappear as a species if we will not start to make at least some effort for our own salvation.This film brought the second Cesar to the star of 'Inglourious Basterds' Mélanie Laurent. Only the first she has received as an actress for the movie "Do not worry, I'm fine" in 2007, and now she has won as a director in the category Best Documentary Film.Clearly, the picture is noteworthy. Especially it will be interesting to those who are concerned about environmental issues, globalization, urbanization, etc. It is unlikely that it will move the boulder of all- consuming capitalism, reach out the hearts of politicians and businessmen. But many things are going to clarify.

Documentaries about change for a sustainable future come in all kinds and shapes. Often they start with doom and gloom images of what lies in store if we don't mend our way toward sustainable behaviour, with a closing 'happy chapter'. Nothing like this in Demain / Tomorrow. It's overall tone is realistically-optimistic, showing a 5-themed search for examples of projects and persons trying to put into practice what needs to be done to ensure a resilient future for all of us. Especially its common-sense attitude helps the viewer to relate easily to the (young) film makers. It is quite lengthy (118 minutes), but absolutely worth your time. The score is well-chosen,with some appropriate texts songs by talented Swedish jazz/pop singer Fredrika Stahl.

I rarely have the time to write reviews lately even though i would love to. Avid movie goer and supporter of zero carbon economies, I felt i wasted my time watching Demain, so warning others motivated me to write this one.The first three chapters (agriculture, energy, economy) are bearable because they are in the right direction, including some good interviews such as with Jeremy Rifkin, yet they are broadly banal because they mostly project well known, and often old, stories as something revelatory, new and the future. The European Union has doubled from 8% to 16% in the last ten years the contribution of renewables to the energy mix, with many countries already by 2014 having achieved the 20% target which is supposed to be achieved by 2020. Did we really need pictures of wind farms in Denmark to find out that there is an alternative future? In the first three chapters, my impression was the creators of the movie felt they had just discovered "America".The last two chapters (democracy and education) were worse, trying to talk about hugely complex issues with amateuristic banality and simplifications, e.g the interviewer asks a teacher in Finland about what the projected as ground breaking new teaching techniques are to hear as a response that their objective is to promote tolerance. Finally, i found the way the film was presented as a bit manipulative with all the pictures about the alternative futures being framed in idealistic settings, shot in sunny days, beautiful sunsets, or sitting by the sea on a warm summer day. I guess in the real world it does rain too sometimes, and to be credible and avoid descending into propaganda one has also to address the challenges too. I feel a good documentary should encourage debate and present different views. Nothing of this here. I agree with the direction of the movie: urban farming, low or zero carbon economies, local community economies to balance the excesses of global capitalism, my views too. In short, promoting more resilient societies in an increasingly globalised world. My disappointment comes from my belief that misguided efforts to popularise alternative futures and misplaced enthusiasm could do more harm than good, creating cheap expectations that everything is possible and fast, generating simplistic readings of a complex world, and offering cheap optimism where they should encourage personal responsibility. As Jan Techau wrote recently: If you rely on the rage of the people more than on the merits of your own idea, then your case is weak.Alternative futures to be sustainable require dialogue between competing social interests not competing activisms each glorifying its own alternative.

Divided into five chapters - agriculture, energy, economy, democracy, and education - this inspiring documentary gives us hope with non-Utopian, concrete local and global solutions to build a better world for tomorrow: Permaculture and local, organic agriculture, local currencies, circular economy, new modes of active democracy, a more social and human education... For once, I did not leave the cinema with a heavy feeling of impotency and doom after watching a documentary about climate change. The reason is that the film doesn't dwell on the problems that we face but rather on the solutions that we already have and that work. The protagonists are both humble and great. Some are already famous (ex. Pierre Rabhi, Vandana Shiva)but they don't stand as heroes... they are just guides showing us new and innovative paths. The soundtrack and the picture quality are bonuses. Because we must and because we can :)