Benefit of the Doubt

July. 16,1993      R
Rating:
5.1
Subscription
Trailer Synopsis Cast

Twenty two years earlier, Karen helped convict her father, Frank, for the murder of her mother. With his new freedom, thanks to parole, Frank returns home to seek revenge. Having always pleaded his innocence, Frank soon works his way back into Karen's life.

Donald Sutherland as  Frank
Amy Irving as  Karen Braswell
Rider Strong as  Pete Braswell
Graham Greene as  Calhoun
Theodore Bikel as  Gideon Lee
Gisela Kovach as  Suzanna
Ferdy Mayne as  Mueller
Patricia Tallman as  Karen's Mom

Reviews

Alicia
1993/07/16

I love this movie so much

... more
Borserie
1993/07/17

it is finally so absorbing because it plays like a lyrical road odyssey that’s also a detective story.

... more
Zlatica
1993/07/18

One of the worst ways to make a cult movie is to set out to make a cult movie.

... more
Bob
1993/07/19

This is one of the best movies I’ve seen in a very long time. You have to go and see this on the big screen.

... more
Desertman84
1993/07/20

Benefit Of The Doubt is a movie about a psychopath, done serving time for the murder of his wife, returns to avenge himself on the witness who put him away: his daughter. It stars Donald Sutherland, Amy Irving and Rider Strong. It marks the directorial debut for producer Jonathan Heap.In this suspense thriller, a woman wonders if she can trust her memory when her father returns from prison a very different man from the violent psychopath she remembers. Karen is a single mother who twenty years ago delivered the testimony that put her father Frank behind bars for the murder of her mother. While Karen has no doubts that Frank is guilty of the crime, the years have clouded her memory a bit and she doesn't recall all the events with complete clarity. Now that Frank has been released, he's returned to Karen's neighborhood and is going out of his way to ingratiate himself with Pete her son, and Dan her boyfriend. A furious Karen confronts Frank, but she discovers a father who is not the ogre she sent to prison but a calm, charming, well-spoken gentleman who seems to bear her no ill will. They discuss the death of Karen's mother and Frank begins to convince her that it was all a terrible accident. Frank begins to work his way back into Karen's life as he gradually cuts her off from her circle of friends; when Dan dies under mysterious circumstances, Karen thinks nothing of it, but Sheriff Calhoun wonders if Frank might have something to do with the crime. There's hardly a moment in the film when we can believe the events on a psychological level, or even on the level of a manipulative thriller. The performances are good. Sutherland is creepy as he recites his pious platitudes, and it's fun to see Irving in a down-home blue-collar role. Unfortunately, suspense is not the strongest suit as it is has a predictable screenplay. Too bad, because a more interesting movie might have resulted if one of the story's unrealized ideas had been used. That's the possibility that the Frank might, in fact, be innocent. As we meet him, he's being released on parole after serving a 22-year sentence for murdering his wife. The key testimony against him at the trial came from his daughter then a child, now a single mom working as a waitress in a strip club. Did Karen tell the truth in her testimony? The movie tries to build up evidence that she might have been "guided" by a defense attorney. Now, with Frank out and headed her way, she's in terror that he might strike again."I won't forget this," he told her as he was led off to prison.Since we know with some certainty that he was in fact guilty, the accuracy of her testimony is a blind alley. We know he killed, and we suspect he'll kill again. But think how much more involving the movie would have been if the first hour played it straight, pretending that Frank was unfairly framed, and that he is now prepared to forgive his daughter and start life again. That would make the movie's later developments truly frightening, instead of drearily inevitable. It could have been a great movie if the story had these smarts and subtlety instead of becoming clichéd that makes it an average movie. What a waste!!!!

... more
theowl63-1
1993/07/21

I have to say that although the story itself was quite mediocre, casting Amy Irving as the daughter was a brilliant move. Irving was practically unrecognisable as the woman who - many years ago - identified her father as the murderer of her mother.Irving is relaxed, uninhibited & - again - almost unrecognisable in her role as Karen Braswell. Karen has straight, bleached blond hair & drives a pick-up. Her role blew me away when I first saw this film. After "Carrie," "The Fury," etc... I was so used to seeing Irving as curly-haired, cautious, & retrospective. Karen Braswell was brashy, kinda trashy, blond & sure of herself - a role that actors literally kill for.If you are a fan of acting, I highly recommend seeing this film JUST for Amy Irving's performance. She is AMAZING-!!!

... more
judithw100
1993/07/22

Likewise for me, it's been a while since I've seen this movie, however, I remember it distinctly because of its stars. I would recommend it for the following reason. If you have visited the area of Page, Arizona, and Lake Powell it's quite a kick to see this movie placed in that locale. Marvelous chases through the mysterious sandstone passages and on the water. Sometimes the location can be as much of a drawing point as the plot and actors. I've seen many otherwise mediocre things that have been filmed in a particular city or other location that I'm familiar with. London is among my favorites. Interesting twists of plot and getting three great names like Amy Irving, Donald Sutherland and Graham Greene is quite a coup. It's good viewing for a chilly night with nothing better to do.

... more
David Vanholsbeeck
1993/07/23

I saw this film quite a while ago and really don't remember much of the story, which says quite something. I think it was about a father (Sutherland) who threatens his daughter and it was supposed to be a thriller. Sutherland has played a lot of these characters, but it's a shame he always ends up in ordinary, unremarkable films such as this one. It's not good, it's not bad, it's as mediocre as it gets. 5/10

... more