I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much

Fresh and Exciting

A lot of perfectly good film show their cards early, establish a unique premise and let the audience explore a topic at a leisurely pace, without much in terms of surprise. this film is not one of those films.

There are moments in this movie where the great movie it could've been peek out... They're fleeting, here, but they're worth savoring, and they happen often enough to make it worth your while.

This third part of the franchise see's two children from the original town massacre adopted and moved to the big city. One takes to his new surroundings well and begins to make friends while his younger brother continues his loyalty to "He who behinds behind the rows"For a start I was glad of the new setting, however it quickly became apparent that they really weren't going to utilize it.Eli becomes yet another child preacher and alike those before him is obnoxious and plays his well really well.The film itself plays out basically exactly as you'd expect. Religion, a few deaths and an "Ultimate showdown" at the end.Not good, not bad, just more of the same when by all rights it should have been really quite different.The Good:Follows on quite wellThe Bad:Nothing exactly stands outSome ropey sfx at the endThings I Learnt From This Movie:Corn cross, corn bible, whole things getting a bit corny

Another winner in a series that knows how to innovate and keep it fresh. Children of the Corn III are two kids who bring the country to the Urban city.Daniel Cerny picks up the mantel as the new minister for he who walks behind the Rowe and recruits a new harvest of kids to kill their parents and worship his demoness.What impressed me was to see the risks they were willing to take with installment by incorporating a metropolis, a fuel out between good & evil and finally revealing what he who walks behind the rowes looks like. Even though the sock puppet looks dated compared to chi today.The storyline is a little cheesy with all the kids wearing black to represent how bad they became, but it makes up for it in characters you care about, the music, atmosphere and scares.It isn't a gore fest like some of the others and has a low body count, but it keeps you entertain all the way through no matter what ratings say.Now The only complaint I have is who is Eli? Where did He come from? His brother said they found him in the field and a book he uses as his power source?Other then those details it felt like a great entry.

I didn't expect much when I clicked on this movie on Netflix but I do have to admit that I was pleasantly surprised. Really what kept my interest is the fantastic acting of the kid who played Eli. He gives the character a lot of intensity however there are a few details in the movie that costs it a few stars mainly the ending where at one point I thought I was watching an episode of robot chicken it was that bad. Also the way the story ended seemed a little rushed or something as if the writers were in a hurry to put together something and the effects team had no budget but aside from that if you enjoyed the original I would definitely recommend this one

Apart from the Texas-sized loopholes in the script, this film is one of the corniest horror films I have ever watched. Stephen King is credited as one of the writers, and this is surprising to see as it is unclear if he has actually contributed to the script or this film was inspired from King's initial novel. The acting is quite mediocre, but the special effects are of record tackiness, with human puppets of the amazing quality of voodoo dolls. The gore factor is satisfying, even unexpectedly high. The reference to environmental issues as a contemporary premise to any evil we see on screen is flimsy and ephemeral. Overall, spare a few bucks to rent this on a Saturday night in with your friends and pizza.