The plot isn't so bad, but the pace of storytelling is too slow which makes people bored. Certain moments are so obvious and unnecessary for the main plot. I would've fast-forwarded those moments if it was an online streaming. The ending looks like implying a sequel, not sure if this movie will get one

It’s sentimental, ridiculously long and only occasionally funny

A terrific literary drama and character piece that shows how the process of creating art can be seen differently by those doing it and those looking at it from the outside.

The movie's neither hopeful in contrived ways, nor hopeless in different contrived ways. Somehow it manages to be wonderful

I am always blown away by how Tom Hardy uses his voice & body to become a character, fictional or non-fictional. I can't wait to see another film with him in it...I've seen 'Mad Max:Fury Road', 'Dark Knight Rises', 'Inception' and 'Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy', twice apiece. 'Legend' I have seen three times. He is an actor you just can't stop watching. I am very puzzled in the above list of plot keywords: pubic hair? male frontal nudity? Why are those the terms listed, instead of :alcoholism, addiction, friendship, childhood trauma? I do agree with the person who stated this a film most people should see. Addiction has a vice-like grip on large numbers of the globe at this time. This film could open eyes to how to navigate the social issue of addiction.

This film is outstanding. Hardy has done a fantastic portrayal of stuart. This i know as my husband knew stuart shorter. The film is funny in places and warm hearted, but also very hard hitting. It made me cry because of how sad stuart was towards the end of his life. An alcohol drug addicted man who didn't see any real way out of his lifestyle. "convict curry" makes me laugh each time i watch it. I've lost count of how many times i have watched this film. I also have the book which is also a must have. This shows how two people from very very different backgrounds can become a huge part of each others life. And just how dark and sad somebody can become because of awful events in their life. Overall i love this film and if ever i did have the pleasure to meet mr tom hardy i would shake his hand and thank him for his superb work.

This is the first time I've commented on IMDb but this film deserves to be seen by more people so I thought I'd give it another positive review. To begin with I thought Tom Hardy, who played Stuart, turned in an excellent performance and I'm sure we'll see plenty more from him in the future. Despite being a knife-wielding, psychopathic, booze hound even from the beginning, I felt empathy for his character, its hard not to. All of the acting is as good as the script allows but Hardys performance just shines through. However its really the story, told backwards, thats the reason this is such a enchanting film. Having read the book a couple of days ago i can also add this film, refreshingly, is very true to, and just as good as, the book. I've no idea if it was on TV or has been released on DVD, but if you get the chance watch this film, its thought provoking, heart wrenching, enthralling, funny, stomach churning, touching and it will be an eye opener to a lot of people.WATCH THIS FILM!

Alexander Master's book, Stuart: A Life Backwards, is a masterpiece and probably influences my rating here but I think this adaptation for the BBC captures all the elements of the story extremely well. Whilst some of the detail of the tragic events of Stuart's childhood are given little airtime, the impression is not lost and reflects the need to stick to 90 minutes per the BBC's commission rather than being the result misguiding adaptation.The viewer is taken on a trip through the downs and downs of Stuart's incomprehensibly tough upbringing in reverse, starting with his present day life as a psychotic homeless junkie and moving back towards the climax of the movie which is the horrific abuse he suffered so young in his short life and how his dependence on the drug of violence was initially catalysed.Stuart is superbly played by Tom Hardy and whilst it can take a while to tune in to his often quiet and Muscular Dystrophy affected voice, ultimately it only reflects on the quality of the performance that this aspect was not compromised for the viewers.I was less satisfied by the casting of Benedict Cumberbatch as Alexander, the author who befriends Stuart through the biographical process. I'm sure he plays Alexander very accurately but I found it harder to believe in this character.Finally, I wish the movie had focused more on the possible reasons for the final outcome. The book spends a good deal of time on the epilogue and when watching with my wife who had not read the book, I felt that I needed to explain more than perhaps ought to have been necessary. Having spoken to the director, David Attwood, he did convince me to a degree that it was better this way.Regardless, as a self-contained piece of work, the movie is an amazing piece of work for all concerned and it deserves all the plaudits and credit it has received; not least for the input of Stuart's family and Alexander himself. I don't recall watching such a good TV movie in many many years Stuart Shorter, rest in peace; it wasn't your fault.