The lives of three female assassins take a sudden turn when their charming boss lures them into one last job. They soon find themselves thrust into a bizarre situation involving a psychotic hit man, a grizzled trucker and a delusional line cook.
Similar titles
You May Also Like
Reviews
Load of rubbish!!
When a movie has you begging for it to end not even half way through it's pure crap. We've all seen this movie and this characters millions of times, nothing new in it. Don't waste your time.
This is a small, humorous movie in some ways, but it has a huge heart. What a nice experience.
Worth seeing just to witness how winsome it is.
If you prefer your movies that have a broken time line, That jump from post time to pre time, with no context. This maybe for you.I deleted the move before the 2nd act. As the Director, tried too much to do a "dusk till dawn" And had no clue how to edit.CLue #1 CONTEXT! As you learn in school which was fully missed here - Less is more.!
For Tes and her two cohorts Kara and Dawn, the job sounded simple enough: intercept a double-cross drug shipment for their crime boss Mel at an isolated diner. But when an unstoppable chain of events unfolds, everyone soon realizes no one is who they seem and the job may be something other than eliminating the competition. What started as simple instructions has now turned into a deadly cat-and-mouse game - with large guns pointed at everyone. Catch .44 feels like a boring and bland rip-off of a Tarantino film with Bruce Willis and his wig, alot of boring dialogue inside a Dinner and above all somehow Forest Whitaker said yes to this for some reason. The action is little and the characters are also hard to like or even care for a little bit. This is the perfect example of Willis downfall. (0/10)
Not good at all. The dialogue and its delivery, especially by the 3 girls, has you wondering why you didn't persist with your own theatrical pursuits because you would surely do a better job. To be fair, they would have been directed to bash out this forced, contrived, try- hard, Point Break type of hard-assed goofball dialogue. Awkwardly slotting in the f word to try to give it some sort of edge but only appearing absolutely unnatural doesn't make for any sort of meatiness. FW is good, BW average, but I spent the final 95% of the movie waiting and hoping (but knowing my dream wouldn't come true) for the third chick to bite the bullet. The whole thing smacks of an amateurs attempt at such a genre. Very high school!
...create this account. Imagine my disappointment when finding that there was no "0" grade. Ah. well. I suppose a "1" will have to do.I don't blame the actors, I blame the writers, director, the DP, the editor, basically anyone who had something to do with the awful script and crappy visuals. To call this a Tarantino ripoff would be an insult to Tarantino ripoffs.I need seven more lines, but I can't think of anything else to say.This movie doesn't deserve ten lines of text.I hope all of the actors involved fired their agents.Seriously, a Bruce Willis song?"Hey, lets make a movie like Tarantino would, if he had no talent." - the people who made this piece of crap.My favorite part of this movie was right before I pushed "play", before any hope of seeing a good film was dashed in the first five minutes of watching.How did they get some of the actors to agree to be in this? I can only imagine blackmail or the kidnapping of loved ones was involved.