Beautiful, moving film.

The film creates a perfect balance between action and depth of basic needs, in the midst of an infertile atmosphere.

The movie is wonderful and true, an act of love in all its contradictions and complexity

It's easily one of the freshest, sharpest and most enjoyable films of this year.

It has to be kinda sequel of the same titled movie, but, in fact it is the remake. All the same: the same American South, the same physically precocious American schoolgirls in bikinis, that do not disdain of same-sex or murder for the millions inheritance, the same cascade of deception and fraud.Actually copying the original story, Jack Perez does not bring to life his own movie. Similar patterns need actor's charm, possibly negative.And if Neve Campbell and Denise Richards was (at least) just a pleasure to watch, in the second part the actresses from the local drama club were taken.The only notable figure against the cardboard villains is an insurance agent, played by Isaiah Washington. Sometimes it seems that his character got here from another, more successful film.+ Good script Worthless incarnation

I watched the movie last month. It's an excellent movie with suspense and surprise at every moment. The strarring of my favourite actress Susan wards is so amazing (Besides she's beautiful too). The director of the movie needs an equal appreciation. I hope more sequel of wild things will be made.Another thing is its back ground music. The back ground music that is heard in the beginning of the movie and at the end. So pretty......... The ending is also nice. The end reveals how the robbery is planned.. So very bad for those who leave the chair upon seeing the credits. They miss the 'important part'.

It's almost all been said about this dreck already except one thing. Yes I've found a new complaint for this rubbish! Apparently the people creating this movie have no idea how wealth should look, or they thought their audience would be fooled, or perhaps they thought that everything else in this (Did I mention this movie isn't worth downloading for nothing?) awful flick was so bad nobody would find the time to complain about what I'm going to complain about! Whatever. The limousine the supposedly wealthy girl rides in would have been old in 1990! The, rather small, home she lives in is devoid of decent furniture or art (Oh but it has a plain and cheap looking wine cellar, she must be rich!). The clothes Ms. Ward wears could be obtained easily at Sears.It has been said already that this drivelfest fails to get even the easy stuff right and this is yet another example.Pity I can't give it a 0.

This movie is exactly like the first Wild Things, a scam + a threesome (FFM) + murder + corruption. The only differences are that there was more nudity, the acting wasn't as good, and there were more characters involved in the movie. If you've seen the 1st Wild Things, there's no reason to watch this movie- they have the same chain of events (more or less). If you haven't seen the 1st Wild Things, there's still no reason to watch this movie, unless you only want to see hot girls frolic in a pointless movie, then by all means watch it. If you're looking for pornography, look elsewhere. They remain clothed from the waist down. If you're looking for a real chain of events, watch the first movie. I personally think it was better at surprising the audience than the second movie.