In truth, there is barely enough story here to make a film.

To all those who have watched it: I hope you enjoyed it as much as I do.

All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.

Blistering performances.

The movie was excellent. Vikram's acting was main highlight in the movie. Visual Effects were amazing. The film was thrilling. Songs and BGM was amazing.

the first thing to say is about Vikram .. unbelievable acting.. but the plot was bad .. Shankar's thinking level is too bad .. very old story line that revolves around revenge .. but the revenge in different ways .. bad comedy scenes.. many unwanted scenes in the movie ..the movie is too boring in the first half..then gains pace in the second the visual of the songs are great and u never take your eyes off the screen.. the twist before the climax was bad..songs are really good .. A R Rahman has done a good job .. the camera was handled perfectly by P C Sreeram for a story like this..the movie is not worth a 3 year wait

First of all i have been watching Shankar's movies since "Gentleman" and its hard to categorize this movie int he same league as his other classics like "Indian" , "Gentleman" or "Mudhalvan". So, what is Shankar all about, then? First and foremost, at the core of most of his films are the societal ills that affect India as a country. I've often thought about these social message Southie masalas, that tackle pretty serious topics, like corruption, black money, etc. The films typically offer up one hero to preach at the crowds and scare the evil-doers into acting responsibly and morally. The message is; if we all stopped doing this, we wouldn't have this problem. Everybody needs to correct their own behavior, and if we all do so, the problem will cease to exist.But in this movie Shankar's previous complex themes are non existent. Even if "I" isn't as solid as some other Shankar films I've seen it brings on entertainment . And the song picturizations exhibit the grandeur scale reminiscent of Shankars movies, Visual, explosive, and excellent cinematography. In the very least "I" is a better movie compared to Endhiran In keeping one's attention to the story , but lacks the punch and buildup of Anniyan or Indian.The plot is fairly simple in the beginning, but blows up to bigger epic proportions by the end of the film. It's a decent run of the mill film with some flow in the second half but just lacks depth in storyline. The lack of societal message is somehow replaced with the main character's believability and sympathy one should have towards him and his dire situation. Both the lead actors and actress have put up a fine performance. AMY Jackson looks exceptionally beautiful in this film .AR Rahman's music seems rather ordinary except for one or 2 well made songs. The background score seems to be lacking as compared to previous Shankar- AR Rahman combos. Overall, "I" is the quintessential Shankar films but one that I wouldn't recommend as anybody's first Shankar film. It's story is a little dated ( something out from 1980s revenge films) but doesn't fail to entertain.

Sankar Sir Make a Different Revange Store About Love Best Diraction , Best Screnply Best Acting Best Script Best Musick All Over One Of the Best And Uniq Of Indian Cinemas I Was Thiss Move 5 Time in Thetaer and it wazs Muset Seeand Vikar Is Best Roll in the CharacterAnd Diloug me by must and goodMy Rating is 10/10Sankar Sir Make a Different Revange Store About Love Best Diraction , Best Screnply Best Acting Best Script Best Musick All Over One Of the Best And Uniq Of Indian Cinemas I Was Thiss Move 5 Time in Thetaer and it wazs Muset Seeand Vikar Is Best Roll in the Character And Diloug me by must and goodMy Rating is 10/10