Overrated

Good concept, poorly executed.

Exactly the movie you think it is, but not the movie you want it to be.

This is one of the best movies I’ve seen in a very long time. You have to go and see this on the big screen.

In the wake of their son's fatal car collision, Anne and Paul Sachetti move to a new home in rural New England (upstate New York). Upon meeting the people of the nearby town, they soon learn that their new home has a dark past.We Are Still Here is one of those recent horror movies like You're Next and House of the Devil that has a real love for the genre. It's gory, it's creepy, it's set in the 70's (very important for some reason), and it has horror star power. Barbara Crampton, who plays Anne, is well known for playing Megan in Re-Animator. Larry Fessenden, who plays Jacob, is an indie-horror standard-bearer and also the producer of Stake Land.Watched on Vudu

"We Are Still Here" is a tedious, disjointed horror movie, notable only for its inability - refusal, almost - to generate any fear or tension. It's one of those movies that feels like you are watching it over someone else's shoulder, or perhaps it's being shown on TV in a department store, and you can only see it through the window.The plot is not entirely hackneyed. Sure, we've seen haunted house things before, and the introduction of characters who are versed in the occult has a discouraging smack of "Paranormal Activity" about it. Where it showed promise was the idea that the house itself demands sacrifice from whoever stays there, and the townsfolk know about it.Cue the obligatory scene where the good guys go out to dinner in a pub where everyone stops talking and eyes them suspiciously. You see, all the interesting twist on the haunted house premise allowed the movie to do was throw in another clichéd scene for the price of one.The climax, when it comes, is just violence for the sake of it, that I guess we are supposed to be shocked by. Is it even possible for movie violence to shock us anymore? This is a world where "torture porn" has been a lucrative genre for well over a decade.Violence as a climax is just a lame cop out, the filmmakers admitting they're incapable of thrills and they know it, so here, have some blood and guts instead.A completely forgettable ending to a forgettable movie.

Now does this movie have flaws? What movie does not have any flaws? Some care about those more, some care about them less. Some are more apparent, some are almost invisible (like ghosts). Which brings us to this movie, that has some over the top dialog and some over the top things happening, but all are meant to be this way.That doesn't mean you have to like the movie, but it also doesn't mean you have to hate it for that. I actually thought a lot of things were funny. Especially when the movie gets self aware and has fun almost kind of spoofing itself. That's a fine line of course and not everyone will be loving this. I thought this is well executed and while not the best horror movie of 2015, still a very enjoyable one

I F*** hated it, it was terrible and not in a good way. I started to see it and first 10-15 minutes and I thought OK it's somewhat boring but let's give it a chance, it has many good reviews and everything, so I gave it a shot and turned out to be a complete disaster.let's begin with the history which was none(I mean there's no explanation, although some other movies pull it off quite well )and the development of the same(poor) and justification for the action of some characters. Also ..what's up with the acting? gosh they were so bad.There are people who say it's a good 70s/80s kind of film but NO way I've seen quite a few(many) films from that time and they were great. So... I feel I lost my time watching this..