CSI: Crime Scene Investigation

CSI: Crime Scene Investigation

2000
CSI: Crime Scene Investigation
Watch on
CSI: Crime Scene Investigation
Watch on

CSI: Crime Scene Investigation

7.7 | TV-14 | en | Drama

A Las Vegas team of forensic investigators are trained to solve criminal cases by scouring the crime scene, collecting irrefutable evidence and finding the missing pieces that solve the mystery.

View More
Watch Now
Rent / Buy
Buy from £1.99

Seasons & Episodes

15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
SEE MORE
SEE MORE
SEE MORE
SEE MORE
SEE MORE
SEE MORE
SEE MORE
SEE MORE
SEE MORE
SEE MORE
SEE MORE
SEE MORE
SEE MORE
SEE MORE
SEE MORE
SEE MORE
7.7 | TV-14 | en | Drama , Crime , Mystery | More Info
Released: 2000-10-06 | Released Producted By: Alliance Atlantis , CBS Studios Country: Budget: 0 Revenue: 0 Official Website: http://www.cbs.com/shows/csi/
info

A Las Vegas team of forensic investigators are trained to solve criminal cases by scouring the crime scene, collecting irrefutable evidence and finding the missing pieces that solve the mystery.

Genre

Drama , Crime , Mystery

Watch Online

CSI: Crime Scene Investigation (2000) is now streaming with subscription on Paramount+

Cast

Ted Danson , George Eads , Jorja Fox

Director

Andi Brittan

Producted By

Alliance Atlantis , CBS Studios

CSI: Crime Scene Investigation Videos and Images

View All

CSI: Crime Scene Investigation Audience Reviews

Dirtylogy It's funny, it's tense, it features two great performances from two actors and the director expertly creates a web of odd tension where you actually don't know what is happening for the majority of the run time.
Erica Derrick By the time the dramatic fireworks start popping off, each one feels earned.
Quiet Muffin This movie tries so hard to be funny, yet it falls flat every time. Just another example of recycled ideas repackaged with women in an attempt to appeal to a certain audience.
Freeman This film is so real. It treats its characters with so much care and sensitivity.
Sober-Friend I really loved this show. I knew it would be a hit when I saw the first preview. It first came on Friday Nights at 9pm. The pilot was great. It was seen through eyes of the new hire into the world of the Las Vegas Forensic Team. By the end of the first episode the new hire was DEAD and that was a huge shock to me. I wasn't the only one that loved that pilot. Each week the ratings were rising. When Season 2 of Survivor Premiered in the Spring of 2001 on Thursday Night CBS wisely moved the rookie forensic show and it became a huge smash and stole some of spotlight away from not only "Survivor" but also "The Sopranos". C.S.I. was ground breaking. Every year it seem to show more and more blood. However the downfall of the show was some the crazier cases they came up with and George Eads Hair one season was a major distraction because he looked like his was an experimental customer at the local beauty college. The shows first 5 years are still worth watching. The cases are not stupid and we still have the original cast. I am hoping that one day CBS will a mini Television season and bring this show back for 10-12 episodes. I just want the original cast back. If they can't get them then don't bother.
daydriver2010 William Petersen left the show and soon after Gary Dourdan's character of Warrick Brown was murdered by the corrupt Las Vegas sheriff. Both of these were season ending shows I believe. Nevertheless, I still continued tuning in for the next season as did many other fans of the show.Then in even later seasons more cast members began leaving the show and were replaced by mostly unknown actors. When the first season starring Ted Danson in the role of chief of the division I laughed out loud. I loved him in "CHEERS" and in "BECKER" where, in both of those long-running series, he played the lead character for laughs. He is a funny man and that is where he should have stayed. His starring role in the later seasons of CSI made me look for something else to watch whenever it came on.Soon after he took over the role they let Marg Helgenberger out of her contract and leave to star in her own series about an FBI agent which was quickly deemed a ratings disaster and was canceled.As to the overall content of the series my chief complaint is that through its entire run it was both too dark and far too graphic. No opportunity was lost to display blood and guts, generally at the expense of character development and the plot of the episode. Why people view the display of (fake) blood, guts, and ripped apart (fake) bodies lying on the (usually blood covered) dirty or wet ground as entertainment befuddles me.I was in the early years very surprised at the commercial successes of both CSI and CSI:Miami, and soon after began to watch the spin off called CSI:N.Y. I liked the two lead actors in that on from their past series work and watched the entire first season. As they renewed it season after season only because the network had nothing better to offer. In later seasons of each of the spin offs I saw they all were struggling to find episode plots that hadn't already been covered completely by the other franchises. That should be blamed on the writers entirely.
Jim de Graff This incarnation of CSI (the one true CSI) has the same shortcoming of every single CSI style procedural I have ever watched. It seems that every crime scene always has to have "the one thing". And that is defined as the one thing that immediately narrows down the list of suspects to one or two people, or the list of regions to one area.Think back to the shows you have watched. Even better, pay attention from now on. How many times do the CSI techs discover a marine organism specific to only one small bay (NCIS New Orleans), bird poop that results from a specific breed of bird eating a specific berry only found in either South America or one specific casino (CSI).I can live with the accelerated time-line resulting in DNA tests taking only an hour instead of weeks but in most cases when a lab tech analyzes dirt left at the scene, what he/she discovers is that it's just freakin' dirt with absolutely nothing special about it. Lab techs do not routinely find that the victim ingested a type of chocolate that is not yet on the market and can only be found at one specific person's house (CSI:NY), or pollen from a plant that only grows in a ten square yard area in Central Park and only blooms on the third Thursday of June (CSI:NY again).And yet, time and time again those miraculous techs (in conjunction with incredibly stupid and/or unfortunate villains) manage, with a few tests, to "nail it". Either these techs are regular miracle workers or the writers just assume we are all morons who won't recognize lazy writing.
Vicky Christidou I don't have watch the series, so I'm not able to say if it's good or not. I guess it will be. Though, I can say that...you can not have so discussing scenes, like open dead bodies, or heads etc. Take for example CSI New York, or NCIS. Yes,they will show what they have to show in order not only to "get the point" but also to be seemed realistic,without,however, make you wanna vomiting. A small child, an old lady, or others like me can open the TV at the time that you are showing some of those "lovely"scenes as it happens to me some minutes ago! So, it's not only an If-you-can't- stand-it-don't-watch-it subject... Thank you.