40 years after the first haunting at Eel Marsh House, a group of children evacuated from WWII London arrive, awakening the house's darkest inhabitant.
Similar titles
You May Also Like
Reviews
People are voting emotionally.
Entertaining from beginning to end, it maintains the spirit of the franchise while establishing it's own seal with a fun cast
It’s not bad or unwatchable but despite the amplitude of the spectacle, the end result is underwhelming.
Actress is magnificent and exudes a hypnotic screen presence in this affecting drama.
The Woman in Black Angel of Death: Movie Review.The Woman in Black: Angel of Death is an okay type of fair horror movie with some creepy and scary elements. The movie has dark atmospheric tone and vibe and is visually stylish and sharp, but lacks the creepiness of the first part The Woman in Black film, still the movie has some visually dark and creepy sequences. The film lacks intensity and intriguing elements in it story because there is not much story. Main lead characters are dull and boring. The film lacks character development and there is very less feel of tension and scares. The story feels empty and undeveloped. The horror aspect of the movie seems hollow at certain points and has no deep or real impact. All over, its just a below average not so good horror film.(Please Note: That This Review represent only my professional point of view and my personal honest opinion about the film, and does not represent others. Thank You).
... if you're going to try to cash in on success at least do it well! I loved The Woman in Black - both the original and the remake - and, like most people of the same opinion, looked forward to revisiting the spookiness of Eel Marsh House. What a let down!The acting is reasonable. Phoebe Fox looks suitably scared running along dark corridors and peering fearfully through windows. They all do their best within the limitations of the script and the direction. The film is annoyingly dark and hazy, which I imagine was an attempt to create atmosphere (as precious little else in the film does) but instead is just ... well, annoying! There are a few frights but the fright formula is repeated so frequently throughout the film that it becomes tedious and predictable. The real villain of this piece is the director. As a stand alone film this would probably scrape by as an average horror but the problem is we judge it against it's predecessor and it doesn't come close. The Woman in Black was a class act, atmospheric and spooky with some genuine frights and good acting. This looks like it was thrown together in a couple of days. Watch it if there's nothing else on telly but don't pay good money to see it.
it is a correct horror. and a not bad sequel. it not gives more surprises but preserves the original atmosphere, gives decent story and good performances, reminds old fashion horror rules. and this is a virtue in the middle of films of genre reduced at blood and cries. in same measure, a good point is represented by the war atmosphere who gives a special nuance to the story. short, a good film. for the grace to use different ingredients - the love story, the dark rooms, the pressure to the teachers to protect the children, the effort to save and the hope force. a film like an old picture, more then the first film. because it gives many opportunities to explore the sides of a revenge myth. because it has the almost ignored virtues of the classic horror. and this is real a good thing.
Where can I begin, on the positive side the acting is good considering the script. This movie is only slightly better than the awful first one. Another movie that tries to go to the limits but gets absolutely nowhere. It's one of those terrible movies when you think "Why did i bother" The story was muddled and weak and I'm sure those actors must have wondered if they were rehearsing for two different movies. Watch this garbage at your peril, it is really dire and not befitting of a Hammer movie.Some of the scenes did not even belong in the storyline, I suppose the old cliché is true that no matter how good the acting is, if its badly produced and directed it just doesn't work.