Good movie but grossly overrated

everything you have heard about this movie is true.

Fanciful, disturbing, and wildly original, it announces the arrival of a fresh, bold voice in American cinema.

The film creates a perfect balance between action and depth of basic needs, in the midst of an infertile atmosphere.

In this story another psychopath serial killer starts killing everybody. Gale, the reporter and writer, Dewey, the cop start to investigate who was behind all this. This is the squeal of the movie ' Scream' and I think it was pretty good. Some parts are scary and was , especially the starting part. I really liked this thriller movie. i suggest every one to watch this amazing movie. Don't miss this movie. I am very eager to watch the third part of 'Scream'.

Two years after the first series of murders, a new psychopath dons the Ghostface costume and a new string of killings begins. Scream 2 is directed by Wes Craven once more and stars Neve Campbell, Courteney Cox, David Arquette and Jamie Kennedy and what truly surprised me about this movie is how they basically make fun of terrible horror sequels without the film being terrible and actually it's as good as the first one if not better it also has a bigger cast this time Sarah Michelle Gellar, Liev Schreiber , Timothy Olyphant, Jada Pinkett Smith and Jerry O'Connell and although it's basically the same once more it's not a bad re-telling of the same plot there's some shocking plot twists especially with Kennedy's character and the film itself is directed by Wes Craven once more which it makes you wonder on how did it got a 56% Audience Score on RT? And just like the first film the beginning of the movie is again an awesome powerful scene.

Immediately after the hype surrounding Scream (1996) and the start of a new horror genre it was clear that part 2 was on it's way as soon as possible. Again directed by Wes Craven it should be another hit.Not that it was that bad but some scene's took too long (espescially towards the end) and the plot like in the original one wasn't anywhere to spot. But it is still worth picking up but not that gory as the original one. What was nice is that all characters were back with their original thespians and that did add something towards the belief in the story. Another success it became and the franchise was started. For me it's still okay but not a masterpiece like the 1996 flick. If you look to other flicks that came out picking in on the Scream success then this is a better one then the others.Gore 1/5 Nudity 0/5 Effects 3/5 Story 2,5/5 Comedy 0/5

This is a rarity--a sequel that doesn't suck! This takes place a few years after "Scream". Sidney (Neve Campbell) is in college still recovering from virtually all her friends being killed years before. Then a movie called "Stab" opens that is a fictional account of what happened. Then the murders start happening again centered around Sidney. GREAT sequel with a wonderful script, mostly great acting and plenty of action. The body count has been upped, the killings are more brutal and bloody and this film is very scary. There is humor of course but it takes a back seat to horror. Well-directed by Wes Craven too. There's only two problems. One is David Arquette. He's TERRIBLE in his role. He appears drugged out. The second is the killer seems to magically teleport himself to where his victims are. This happens at least three times in the course of the film! Still, if you're a horror film like me, you learn how to totally suspend your disbelief and go with it. A fast, funny and bloody sequel. Avoid "Scream 3" at all costs.