Just perfect...

It’s not bad or unwatchable but despite the amplitude of the spectacle, the end result is underwhelming.

I think this is a new genre that they're all sort of working their way through it and haven't got all the kinks worked out yet but it's a genre that works for me.

what a terribly boring film. I'm sorry but this is absolutely not deserving of best picture and will be forgotten quickly. Entertaining and engaging cinema? No. Nothing performances with flat faces and mistaking silence for subtlety.

The third Wrong Turn movie might not have the atmosphere of the first one but it is very bloody and psycho-trap enough to watch. It is one of those movies that you should all watch with your pals and say oh man that is messed up, that is some real sh*t. I totally recommend it for a relaxing night and i have to admit this cannibal's face will hunt me for the rest of my life. And maybe you, when you go for a walk in the woods you'll think about him!It is not a total waste of time. There are worse. Watch it.

Wrong Turn 3: Left for Dead is the third instalment in the sequel trilogy of Wrong Turn. Released in 2009, this film takes up the reigns after the reality show of the second film goes horribly wrong. This time, prison convicts and their corrections officer end up crashing and, whilst travelling through the forest, meet a rafter who is on the run from a cannibalistic hunter, tracking them through the forest. They must all work together to survive, however, there's a hierarchy amongst the inmates, and the group have to face the challenges of being lead by one they do not trust.After enjoying the second Wrong Turn film, Dead End, I decided to watch Left for Dead, even though I knew it was likely going to be much worse than both second and first films of the series. Finding out this went straight to video, made me hesitate a little before watching it – horror films that go straight to video are usually the worst of the bunch. But still, I put it on and soldiered through it.I actually thought this one was really well made. The basic plot of being chased through the forest by Three Finger was revamped. Although the same plot, we had a lot of dynamics going on throughout the prisoners and the rest of the group, a danger there that was not yet seen in Wrong Turn films previously, and is a bit of a refreshing add in to the film and series.However, for all intent and purposes, this is still the same film as was done in 2003, just with new actors, new cannibals, and a new basic plot. Although the new idea of the group having issues with each other was refreshing, it's still just the same film. And it's a shame to see this because obviously thought went into it to see how they could revamp the series, how they could add more to the third film to make it a bit more unique.The characters in this were really good. Nate and Alex were wonderful characters – until the ending when Alex lost all her development, and became a damsel in distress – and did this just become Saw at one point? That made me frown a little, when Alex was being held by Three-Finger; the whole plot just seemed to become Saw, and it was a total let down. It just felt like they were trying to rip off the success of the Saw franchise, that was beginning to dominate the horror franchise with a new form of survival horror.I feel like this was definitely the weakest film of the Wrong Turn Sequel trilogy – the three films, 4-6, are set before the films 1-3 – and it was a shame. Although refreshing in some aspects, characters would lose their development, the plot ended up the same, and the CGI for this one was just utterly diabolical. I definitely wouldn't watch this one again, and after watching this, I still don't know why I went on and watched films 4-6. I would say definitely watch the first two Wrong Turn films, and then leave the series at that.

WRONG TURN 3: LEFT FOR DEAD is the third in a series of hillbilly slasher flicks that nobody wanted or asked for. However, despite the obvious limitations with this film series, I find the movies kind of fun: they offer simple, comic book-style story lines, loaded with cheesy acting and even cheesier gore sequences. In truth there's little to dislike about these films.The central thrust of the plot here sees a prison van attacked by a redneck mutant. The surviving prisoners and prison guards are forced to trek through the forest to safety, where they hook up with the sole survivor of another attack. The viewer's left questioning as to what's going to kill them first - tensions within the group, or the increasingly demented attacks from the mutant himself.It's hardly high art but WRONG TURN 3 is relatively amusing for its genre. The cast members certainly breathe life into their exaggerated characters, and I particularly enjoyed Tamer Hassan's turn as a Mexican (!) convict and crime boss. There's a little nudity and peril here, but most of the emphasis is on the violence, which is rubbery and explicit. Hardly disturbing, but kind of fun anyway, and the pacing is fast enough that you never have time to get bored or question the plot holes.

I must admit I like the Wrong Turn series. Prior to watching this I'd seen 1,2 and 4 and enjoyed all of them. The original is by far the best of the bunch but they all provide some mindless gory fun. This one doesn't take long to set up the situation, starting with a funny and gory opening before starting onto the main plot. This time it's escaped convicts battling to stay alive against the inbred hillbillies. Although the film undoubtedly lacks suspense it provides the suitably gruesome deaths and copious gore we are used to in this series. The main fun to be had is finding out who will die next and how.The acting is patchy at best but Tamer Hassan not an actor I normally like does a good job as the main convict. It's easy to knock these films and this is probably the weakest out of the first 4, however I doubt anyone will watch this expecting a classic. If you watch it with suitable expectations it's a mindless but reasonably entertaining horror film.