Don't listen to the negative reviews

Crappy film

It's hard to see any effort in the film. There's no comedy to speak of, no real drama and, worst of all.

what a terribly boring film. I'm sorry but this is absolutely not deserving of best picture and will be forgotten quickly. Entertaining and engaging cinema? No. Nothing performances with flat faces and mistaking silence for subtlety.

A group of friends gather together for a bachelor party only to become fodder for three 'demon' strippers.First off, this movie was made for practically no money. That being said, I kind of enjoyed it more than a lot of mainstream horror films. It reminded me of the fun trash that we used to expect from Troma on a regular basis (Kaufman has as cameo). The acting was bad, but not the worst that I've seen. Some shoddy CGI makes an appearance but I thought that it actually added to the cheese factor. The editing and continuity is a nightmare but, as I said before, cheese factor.This movie is NOT for everyone or even most people. But I was surprised to get a few chuckles out of it and it wasn't as boring as most independent horror seems to be. Movies don't always have to be good to be fun.

Sammy (a solid and engaging performance by Gregg Aaron Greenberg) holds a wild anything-goes bachelor party for this best buddy Chuck (a likable portrayal by Joseph Riker) at a bungalow in the Hamptons. Things go horribly awry when the three exotic dancers -- Snowy (ravishing redhead Zoe Hunter), Emerald (buxom knockout Monique Dupree), and Vermillion (foxy brunette Kaitlyn Gutkes) -- hired to supply the entertainment for said bash turn out to be ferocious demonic succubus vampires with an insatiable taste for male flesh. Writer/director Brian Thompson (who also produced, edited, and even composed the lively score) relates the blithely inane story at a constant zippy pace while delivering a nice smattering of yummy bare distaff skin and pouring on the excessive tacky graphic gore with merry aplomb. Granted, the unapologetically lowbrow humor is admittedly pretty crude and unsubtle, but still often funny in a pleasingly dry'n'deadpan way just the same. The game no-name cast have a ball with their broad roles: Greenberg excels in his juicy lead part, Trina Analee adds plenty of spunk as Chuck's feisty fiancé Michelle, Hunter, Dupree, and Gutkes are suitably sexy and naughty as the blood-sucking undead babes, Troma head honcho Lloyd Kaufman has a hilarious bit as a transvestite, plus there are sound contributions by Joe Testa as awkward'n'uptight nerd Gordon, Sean Parker as obnoxious fat jerk Paulie, and Gelu Dan Rusu as sleazy horndog Fish. The cruddy cut-rate CGI effects add to the film's considerable rinky-dink charm. Demian Barba's reasonably polished cinematography does the trick. The gut-busting ending credits provide some of the movie's best and most uproarious jokes. An absolute hoot.

'Bachelor Party in the Bungalow of the Damned' - What a title, huh? How could this fail with at least being really fun? I don't know, but it did.The story focuses on a group of thirtysomething guys who head up to the Hamptons to a buddy's bungalow to throw a bachelor party for another friend. Once there, a group of middle-aged, overweight hookers (who look nothing, NOTHING like the girl on the cover. . . not even a little bit!) stop by randomly and give the boys a show. Unfortunately, they're possessed by some type of evil/demonic force and they started to kill the guys off (mostly during sex) one by one.There isn't much to expect from a film like this. Technically, the film isn't the worst I've seen, but it's far from good. The cinematography is strange, it goes from steadicam to shakicam, uses random different filters for no reason whatsoever, doesn't focus properly, etc. It's often too dark to see what's going on, especially in some of the outdoor action sequences. The acting was, for the most part, bad. Sammy (Gregg Aaron Greenberg) was probably the only actor that I could really compliment, mostly because he reminded me of Jeff Anderson from the 'Clerks' movies. But, the flick only cost twenty grand to make and it's a film not made looking for great story or acting or anything of the like. It's basically a way to show off some gore effects, nudity, and have a few laughs. Unfortunately, the gore was really not good at all and looked like something out of a crappy 80s TV show. The nudity was, well, nothing we wanted to see as all three of the hookers/strippers really had nothing to offer (actually, they had TOO much to offer for the most part). There were a few laughs, mainly caused by the ridiculousness of it all, but sometimes the dialogue actually gave a giggle. The movie ran about a half-hour too long and around the 40 minute mark, I was merely counting down the time. I mean, if you're going to put most of the story into the first half, why even have the second half? Give us a break and just cut the movie down and make it a quick watch that we can either enjoy or, if we don't like it, just get over with faster. Since they didn't, it's mostly a bore with very little redemption.Final Verdict: 3/10.-AP3-

The story of some single guys throwing a bachelor party that turns into a horror story is bad, and not in a good way.The movie features strippers who don't strip, monsters who aren't scary and acting that would be embarrassing in a first-grade school play. There just isn't anything to like here. The title sounds good enough, but the film itself is just plain boring. It's not even bad in a way that would make it fun, it's just lame.I generally like low-budget movies, but there was nothing that I could groove to in this one. The strippers are unattractive skanks who never strip, the bachelors are boring goofballs, and the horror just isn't there.Some campy fun or snappy dialog would have made this a lot better. Failing that, some respectable amount of gore, special effects or naked chicks could have saved it. Too bad there wasn't any of that.