The latest psychiatrist assigned to assess whether inmate Victor Frank is mentally fit to stand trial for murder gives up in frustration and so the asylum head Dr Robert Walton steps in to do the job. Frank tells Walton his story. He was a scientist experimenting in the field of nanotechnology. Using nanobots that were capable of rebuilding the human body, Frank and his team had great success in helping the crippled, wheelchair-ridden Bryce Daniels regain use of his faculties. But then Bryce started to become unstable...
Similar titles
Reviews
Surprisingly incoherent and boring
A Masterpiece!
There are moments that feel comical, some horrific, and some downright inspiring but the tonal shifts hardly matter as the end results come to a film that's perfect for this time.
This movie feels like it was made purely to piss off people who want good shows
I have read other reviews on this film, and entirely disagree! OK, first things first, yes this is a low budget film, yes these are not Class A actors, however this is a well written, constructed and edited film. The director has obviously much skill in squeezing every penny out of his budget, and I believe possibly got the best performance from his cast that they are ever likely to give.Anyone familiar with the Frankenstein story and its various adaptations should appreciate the originality and freshness of this one. Also, this film has many moments that truly return 'Frankenstein' into the horror genre, where it belongs! (Including a Monster that fits the description of MONSTER)Basically, the director Leigh Scott, has created an above average re-invention of the Frankenstein legend, and I wish him luck with any future projects.
Where to begin? First off, most of the film is flashbacks. Second, the beginning was stupid, and third, a lot of boring dialog and bad actors. The monster is quite disturbing and so is his roar. They had small parts like when a woman is shown for 2 minutes and is killed. There was parts when i felt like turning it off but I had nothing else to do. After the credits end, there is a minute of the screen pitch black and the music still going. I bet it was to make the movie a minute longer. I gave it a 3, because I like b-horror films,i like Frankenstein movies and you have to give Leigh some credit. My recommendation: if you see it at the video store, tell a person working there that it is a waste of money for you to rent that. So stay away as far as possible. Don't say I didn't warn you.
This would have been a nice low-budget horror movie. I enjoyed Rhett Giles rendition of the good doctor. Only thing that bothered me was during the dialog, the score would annoyingly drown it out. I kept having to turn the sound up and down and I still couldn't catch all of what was said. Movie makers take note, please add English subtitles so we can read the dialog if we can't hear it over the crappy score. Whoever did the sound for that movie should never be allowed to mix again! Other than the lousy sound, the actors did fine and were believable enough (except for that part with the little girl not being scared!) for a horror movie. The violence and gore were over the top, the way I like it and the monster looked just great! I wish more of the Frankensteins looked as good as he did. Please, if you otherwise have an OK movie, don't ruin it with bad sound and do add subtitles.
I have seen this film and was expecting something quite good, but its the worst film I have seen in a long time, the acting is atrocious and wooden.It seems as if the film was made just for showing gore and forgetting the acting bit.Basically the storyline would have been good if they had picked decent actors and actresses, bringing it as an up to date story of Frankenstein.The blood and gore were over emphasised and didn't look real. Just a complete waste of time and money.