To me, this movie is perfection.

Simply A Masterpiece

Highly Overrated But Still Good

The film may be flawed, but its message is not.

When I get the chance to view some films from the 1950's, I usually enjoy the great veteran actors and the film story. This film is great because of the great actors like Jean Simmons, (Young Bess/Queen Elizabeth l),"Winter Solstice",'03 TV, who plays a very dramatic role and tries to follow in her fathers footsteps, Charles Laughton,(King Henry VIII),"Advise & Consent",'62, who gives a rather brief performance, but outstanding. Stewart Granger,(Thomas Seymour), plays an Admiral of the English Fleet and is simply adored by Young Bess, who really has the red hots for him since she was a child. Deborah Kerr,(Catherine Parr),"The Arrangement",'61, gets her claws into Thomas Seymour and simply will not let go and there is a bad relation between Catherine and Young Bess. While this film was being produced, Jean Simmons was married in real life to Stewart Granger, and I can see why their kisses appeared so very real and warm. Good Classic film, but rather slow and boring in places.

Its historical inaccuracies aside (including its scrubbed and polished depiction of a far less sanitary time, even, most probably, amidst the pomp and pageantry of the royal court), this costume romance is typical of the very carefully produced and handsomely mounted style of M-G-M in the waning days of its preeminence among the major Hollywood studios. Its well-chosen cast performs most satisfactorily under George Sidney's assured direction and the artistic and technical credits are impeccable, notably the art direction and the almost absurdly luxurious costuming. This film was nominated in the color categories for those two contributions and, most unjustly in my opinion, lost out to Twentieth's first CinemaScope blockbuster, "The Robe," in both cases. The prolific Miklos Rozsa provides one of his more sprightly scores, deftly enhancing the script's focus on the romantic entanglements of the principals. Still, enough attention is paid to the great peril of being close to the apogee of power in England at the time. Throughout a sense of dread pervades the audience's hope that Young Bess might actually survive to realize her dream of a love fulfilled.

Never mind about the historical accuracy, the movie is very enjoyable as a great love story. It is well written and elegantly portrayed by a good assemble of actors. Simmons is excellent as Young Bess, a smart and strong minded princess growing from adolescence into young womanhood, falling for a much older heroic Admiral, attracting his love from his beautiful and tender loving wife. Granger is a great match as Simmon's lover, the arrogant adventurous war hero, also the loving husband of the more classical beauty Kerr. The love triangle between the three is convincing and moving, and its tragic end is heart broken.The costume is wonderful, especially of Granger's.

There really isn't much more that I can add that hasn't been said in previous reviews.Yes,it's historically quite inaccurate with regard to :a.)Tom Seymour's character.b.)The fact that Elizabeth wasn't at all interested in him,romantically.c.)The way Tom Seymour was sent to execution,not at the instigation of his brother,but as a result of his own (failed)machinations.What I found most interesting,however,was the device of having a real-life husband and wife performing the roles of an erotically charged romantic situation.It adds an extra depth,and degree of verisimilitude to what is going on on-screen. Regarding the production,see my comments on "Diane."They apply here equally.