Overrated and overhyped

How sad is this?

At first rather annoying in its heavy emphasis on reenactments, this movie ultimately proves fascinating, simply because the complicated, highly dramatic tale it tells still almost defies belief.

The plot isn't so bad, but the pace of storytelling is too slow which makes people bored. Certain moments are so obvious and unnecessary for the main plot. I would've fast-forwarded those moments if it was an online streaming. The ending looks like implying a sequel, not sure if this movie will get one

Universal Horror is a look back at how Universal got started in the horror movie business. The film includes a heavy dose of very welcome film clips and some interviews with experts on the subject, famous fans, and a few stars that actually worked at Universal in the 30s. Having been a fan of Universal horror films for about 45 years, I was already familiar with most of the information presented in the movie. However, I did learn a thing or two and find some bits interesting. There's also a lot of information presented on non-Universal horror. There are big chunks dedicated to German films, silent films, and King Kong. I appreciate this. Universal didn't exist in a vacuum and drew its early inspirations from a variety of sources. I'm glad these inspirations were given screen time. A few things that stuck out to me: 1. The Cat and the Canary (1927) – I'm a bit surprised how much time this non-Universal movie was given, but it looks great. I've seen the 1939 film, the 1979 film, and others inspired by this movie, but not the 1927 film – something I intend to take care of shortly. 2. The clips of the Universal films look fantastic. It's easy to forget how good these movies look, even though they were made 80+ years ago. I also enjoyed the comparisons to German expressionist films of the 20s. Very enlightening. 3. Fay Wray – I was a bit shocked to see an extended interview with Fay Wray as she never appeared in a Universal horror. Her recollections of filmmaking in the 30s is a highlight of the movie. She was a real looker back in her day. 4. Finally, I was a bit surprised that the Universal history presented in the film ended prior to The Creature from the Black Lagoon. I know it came out way past Universal's heyday, but it was just as about as important and impressive a film for its time as Dracula, Frankenstein, and Co were for theirs.As with all documentaries, I rate them based on two criteria – was it effective and was it entertaining. Effective – somewhat. If you're a longtime fan of Universal like I am, there's not a lot of new ground covered here. If you're new to these films, however, it would probably be hugely informative. I'll give it a 7/10 for effectiveness. Entertaining – I always enjoy seeing clips from these old films. Here, they've cherry-picked the very best scenes. It's a lot of fun. I'll also give it a 7/10 for entertainment value. So, it should come as no surprise that I've rated Universal Horror an overall 7/10.

Kevin Brownlow is an important film historian and has made some truly amazing and complete documentaries about such topics as European cinema between the wars, the work of various silent comics as well as Mary Pickford. For his very hard work, the Academy gave him an honorary Oscar a few years ago. So, this being a Brownlow film, I KNEW I had to see it....and for the first time I was rather disappointed.For me, calling the film "Universal Horror" was a HUGE mistake. While about 90% of the picture does concern the horror movies made by Universal Studios...many of them weren't and it seemed odd to have films like "King Kong", "The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari" and many others featured in the documentary. It really was NOT about Universal...at least not completely. Additionally, MANY of the great Universal Horror films were never even mentioned--such as the Mummy series of the 1940s, the Creeper, Freaks and many other important movies. Woefully incomplete and NOT an exhaustive or even close to complete look at the subject in hand. Sad...but still enjoyable...though WHY did the film keep asking James Karen what he thought about these films?! He seemed to have nothing to do with horror films...so why him?

This is a great documentary chronicling all of the major Universal Horror releases from the 1930s, plus all of the major actors and directors of the period. It's obviously made by people with a great love of the genre, and the affection shines through at every moment. The documentary consists of a number of people sharing anecdotes (it's surprising how many of the actresses - Gloria Stuart, Fay Wray, etc. are still alive) interspersed with loads of clips from the best bits of the films. About half of the stories I had heard already through general reading, but there are a wealth of lesser known snippets among them too.While the film clips highlight all the expected best bits from things like Dracula, FRANKENSTEIN, THE BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN, and THE WOLF MAN, there are also a number of lesser-seen moments too. For example we get to see test footage of a green Frankenstein monster, plus many clips from a lot of rare silent films starring Lon Chaney from the 1920s which are great to watch. Other, less talked-about films are discussed like THE BLACK CAT and THE RAVEN. Author David J. Skal pops up to talk about his love of the films, along with actor James Karen, author Ray Bradbury, Sara Karloff, Forrest J. Ackerman, and scriptwriter Curt Siodmak. UNIVERSAL HORROR is a reverential documentary which has been put together nicely, never outstays its welcome, and really makes you appreciate all those old horror films.

This documentary on classic horror is found on the DVD of the 1932 version of The Mummy. It consists of interviews with actors, crew, experts and those who have been inspired in various ways by the movies, clips of them(from different decades, silent and spoken alike, and you can see the evolution of film-making), behind-the-scenes footage and stills as well as narration(Branagh seldom lets us down, and this is no exception). The amount of journalism alone is impressive here, and the presentation is so smooth and compelling that you end up not able to take your eyes off it. I'm not used to being this captivated by something presented in this medium which is not fiction. They cover a massive amount in the well-paced 95 minutes that fly right by. The technical aspects, different language versions(some of them superior to the American originals!), Boris Karloff, Lon Chaney, make-up, the connection to WWI(the popularity of the thrilling flicks was partially on account of grotesquely hurt and disfigured people(victims of the war) living on, because of medical advances), the accusation of these pictures causing real life crimes, European styles and look, Gothic, Bauhaus, expressionism, art, etc. They even give away how some of the FX were done(including an early version of blue-screen!), and you really understand why these were beloved. Editing is crisp, and this never dwells excessively on anything. There is a lot of disturbing content, gory and violence in this. I warmly recommend this to every single fan of the medium, not just of the period or the specific genre. 8/10