While investigating the death of a friend and fellow cop, Los Angeles police officer Barney Caine stumbles across evidence that Nazis created a synthetic alternative to gasoline during World War II. This revelation has the potential to end the established global oil industry, making the formula a very valuable and dangerous piece of information. Eventually, Caine must contend with oil tycoon Adam Steiffel, who clearly has his own agenda regarding the formula.
Similar titles
Reviews
Tells a fascinating and unsettling true story, and does so well, without pretending to have all the answers.
This is one of the few movies I've ever seen where the whole audience broke into spontaneous, loud applause a third of the way in.
This is a coming of age storyline that you've seen in one form or another for decades. It takes a truly unique voice to make yet another one worth watching.
The film's masterful storytelling did its job. The message was clear. No need to overdo.
Strangely this movie till now is so low rated by IMDb's users,perhaps the whole plot has some holes of course,but to me since the first time amazed me entirely,the story is such fictional but works very well,intriguing and mystery around the Nazi old formula of synthetic fuel,interesting idea to start,but actually the movie stand in two strong columns Scott and Brando in the final scene both are in clash what's they think about the perfect world for everybody,Marthe Keller is another highlights,and a dozen of famous actors whose ennobling the picture!!Resume:First watch: 1987 / How many: 4 / Source: TV-Cable TV-DVD / Rating: 8
I had not seen this film since its theater release some twenty-eight years ago. To my knowledge it has not been shown on TV in the L. A. area until the TCM presentation this month. I had forgotten every single detail of the film except for Marlon Brando's great line "Ah, Arthur, you are missing the point--We are the Arabs." The line says it all and is especially telling in light of current events and players. By some trick of the mind, I ascribed the line to a scene between Brando and Scott instead of Brando and Spradlin. Even in a walk-on I always relish seeing and hearing Wolfgang Preiss. Regardless of disagreements between writer and director, the film proceeded in a style I prefer, leaving me trying to hold on to the plot with my finger tips and trying to keep all the character involvement relevant. I will never understand the gaps in the story line--Scott surreptitiously slipping the secret formula to a total stranger? in some shop? , followed by some tenuously-connected dialog at some safety deposit boxes? Scott proved to be a better detective than I at discerning Keller's covert motives, given the facts presented on film. Perhaps all was made clear in the script. Berlin is a great place for intrigue on film, as we saw in "Company Business", and the plots, and cinematography nicely murky. Even with the story holes and without Travants and the Prater, I recommend viewing this film enough to begin to comprehend it.
This movie is not for the weak of mind. The plot is complex. I remember reading reviews that used words like "murky." Since the movie was a bit more complex than cops chasing robbers around some city at high speed most critics lack the intellectual wherewithal to keep track of what is going on.Beginning with a friend's murder in Los Angeles Lt. Barney Caine, LAPD, (George C. Scott) follows a trail which takes him to Europe and leads to a formula for turning coal into gasoline. It takes Caine a while to uncover this and the plot takes a number of twists and turns. The ending can only reinforce one's cynicism about how the world works.The performances are strong and the movie is well worth the time taken to view it.
I saw this movie when it came out in 1980 and enjoyed it immensely with all of the twists and turns keeping me thinking the whole time. Yes, Marlon and George were perfect for their respective roles. Brando playing the aging corporate bad guy who knows the score, and Scott an over the hill cop who gets his teeth into something he just can't seem to let go of. Both, to me, fit their respective characters well. The nature of the plot, although kept vague was necessary for the internal intrigue to build. Still, many did not like this forced need to contemplate the many aspects of this film as it was being seen. Yet, I wonder if those who did not enjoy this movie as I did might not find it more interesting if viewed today with gas heading toward $4 and then maybe $5 a gallon? Does everyone need to have everything shown to them in a movie or am I just one of the few who's head doesn't hurt when I use it for what it was designed to do? Enjoy this movie for what it is, a commentary on human greed and power.