Sorry, this movie sucks

People are voting emotionally.

The film creates a perfect balance between action and depth of basic needs, in the midst of an infertile atmosphere.

The movie's neither hopeful in contrived ways, nor hopeless in different contrived ways. Somehow it manages to be wonderful

This is a film with nearly all the elements to have been a great film, yet somehow it is merely good. We have the great Orson Welles during his "acting" career in Europe, and he is still young and full of vitality. His protegee Everett Sloan is there to support him and steal the scenes when he can, and Tyrone Power is at the top of his game, never more attractive nor more charming. We also have one of my favorite character actors, Felix Aylmer (Polonius in Olivier's "Hamlet").The music and photography are excellent although this film could have benefited from Technicolor. And Director Henry King does his usual great job of giving us action as well as character development.So where does it fall down? It's the female lead. She is terribly miscast and this fails to give us any real involvement at critical points.If you like good acting, this film should be viewed.

My opinion is that Prince of Foxes could have been as popular as Captain From Castile if it would have been produced in color. The actors were wonderful and Everet Sloan as Belli was perfect. Could there be a better Cesare Borgia than Orson Welles playing everyone against everyone else? The locations and background shots added to the authenticity of the era and personalities portrayed. The shots within the hall with the tapestries on the walls were lost in the black and white production. This movie stoked my interest in Italian history of the Borgia period and Italian history in general. It is a classic story of Italy buried by cheap producers. I wonder how it would look colorized?

I was very pleased with pretty much every aspect of this production. This is really an exceptional historical drama, and although it doesn't have some of the pure thrills of the best swashbuckling action films it more than makes up for it in my book with a complex, adult story that takes the main characters through major transformations. There are many twists and turns in the narrative but all are handled in such a way that neither suspense nor character are sacrificed.The film tells the story of Orsini (Tyrone Power), or a man who calls himself Orsini (we find out that his true mother was a peasant), an extremely cynical and ambitious man in the employ of the famous warlord Cesare Borgia (Orson Welles). Borgia sends him on several missions during which the stated goal is for Orsini to arrange and break marriages that will prove advantageous to Borgia. When he arrives for his first mission in Vienna, he is immediately the object of a botched assassination attempt, but instead of killing the assassin Mario Belli (Everett Sloane) he makes him his assistant. This might seem arbitrary but the further we get into the film we see this is Orsini's true character; he is a master at taking the negative things life throws him and turning them positive.Sloane does his best to steal every scene that Welles hasn't already absconded with, but Power manages to focus the attention on himself a surprising amount of the time all things considered. All 3 are powerful and interesting characters, with Welles' Borgia unfortunately missing in action for the main part of the action but reappearing in a startling torture/dinner scene towards the climax (this is also Sloane's best scene in the film). Those expecting a straightforward adventure/romance story like "Scarlet Pimpernell" or "Zorro" best look elsewhere – this is a story of corruption, betrayal, and redemption which engages the question of the ultimate value or worth of an individual's life. The film's creators have set themselves up with a difficult task – they need to make us dislike Orsini just enough to believe that he truly is a complete opportunist with a consciously Machiavellian philosophy, but like him enough to believe that he's undergoing a slow moral transformation under the influence of Count Verano (Felix Aylmer) and his young wife "Madonna"/Camilla (Wanda Hendrix). They succeed almost perfectly, hampered only slightly by Hendrix' lack of presence (a definite necessity for this role which combines sexual and religious overtones with her royal station). At one point there's a biblical analogy going on, as Orsini paints his friend Belli in a "last supper" scene as Judas and seems to paint Camilla as the Lady Madonna. So there's just a lot going on here depending on where your gaze wanders. In the early parts of the film when Orsini is a total cynic about morality who took advantage of everyone else, I thought I was looking at a kind of period film noir – in fact his character in the beginning is very similar to his great performance in "Nightmare Alley." His dramatic character development is handled in a relatively subtle way – there's a kernel of good in his soul that's revealed in his painting, a reflection of his ability to see beauty in people that's been buried by the harsh demands of life. It does make sense that eventually he would see the beauty and good in himself as well.There seems to be some controversy on the subject of the photography of the film, which many posters say should have been done in color. In my opinion the film has much more style and beauty in black and white. Technicolor is better suited to a less dramatic story; even though this film has some great spectacle – including a full-blown castle siege and a memorable woodland battle in the mist – I think the photography was excellent, and the black and white enhanced the details and beauty of the interiors while keeping the focus firmly set on the actors. Night-time scenes like Belli's assassination attempt and the eerie misty forest would not be as effective in color either. As soon as I saw that this was a serious dramatic piece I was glad not to be distracted by anyone's purple and green tights.One last note on Alfred Newman's score – it is remarkable, one of the best for an epic/period film that I've ever heard. Combined with excellent photography, indelible performances from the 3 male leads, seemingly dozens of authentic Italian locations, and a mature intelligent screenplay, it provides director Henry King with the best production that I've yet seen from the veteran director. I've never known King as a particularly good director of actors but in this film we have 3 performances that are unforgettable. Welles with his bizarre beard and brazen manner paint a portrait of unworthy ambition – at first his greed and power appear glamorous and appealing to us just as they do to Orsini, but eventually he is shown as a petty malicious fool when Orsini and Belli trick him in the supper scene. Sloane's Belli is a fascinating character, totally unpredictable in his behavior but somehow still believable as a human being. Power's Orsini is a remarkable character as well, revealing depths of feeling in the heart of a true warrior. This is just the type of film that entertains you immensely with its plot twists and character developments on first viewing but which I suspect will reveal even more depth upon multiple viewings.

You have to understand that Samuel Shellabarger who wrote Prince of Foxes and Captain from Castile, along with several other sabre-rattling novels of the renaissance, was a very popular writer in the 40s and this movie captures much of the romantic mood of his novels. Tyrone Power had appeared earlier in Captain from Castile which had been a hit and this effort including the great Orson Welles as Cesare Borgia, and two great character actors, Katrina Paxinou and Everett Sloane, was a fantastic production. Wanda Hendrix, who was never any great shakes beyond presenting a pretty Hollywood face, did not distract from the film but the scene chewing between Power, Sloane and, of course, Welles (before he became so obese), is classic. Power with his dark handsome Irish face was always delightful in these heroic roles tinged with darkness. Recall that this film was of the same time period as his classic Nightmare Alley. It is an entertaining yarn but, alas, no video or DVD at this writing, so you'll just have to look for it on the late show. Do so because if you like the romantic golden oldies with a bit of swash and buckle, you'll dang sure like this one.