The story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.

The acting is good, and the firecracker script has some excellent ideas.

The film's masterful storytelling did its job. The message was clear. No need to overdo.

Worth seeing just to witness how winsome it is.

Gilliam is not a difficult man to understand. He's a painter, not a filmmaker, so he is all about scenes and richness of the moment. Everything has to be delivered now; there is no notion of building so that bigger things can be delivered. There's no long form conveyance, no structure at the scale of life: only powerful effect in the moment as if you were on a drug that erased most memory and all anticipative cognition.There's a place for this. Usually it isn't as the filmmaker. But there is a class of films where the inadequacy of the filmmaker is the point: his foibles becoming entangled with what we see on the screen. This was the case with "12 Monkeys" and it is the metastory of this film.Simply put, Bruce Willis' character has no idea what is real or not. He has no concept of narrative continuity. Everything reflects a past future, meaning no future.What he has is what he sees and he has no ability to project. As it happens, Gilliam gets entangled with this project in a way that messes with his life while bending the manner in which the story is told to reflect this quiet madness. So the way the film is broken is the point, and we have this here as the real story.Its pretty cool. You need to see the two together, plus the remarkable "la Jette"Ted's Evaluation -- 3 of 3: Worth watching.

It's always a treat for me to see how a really fantastic film got put together, either through a book or through a documentary in the whole process. Sometimes they're pretty boring, particularly when everyone pats themselves on the back for doing such a good job, or when it's just put together in a haphazard way that doesn't really cover what you'd want it to. The Hamster Factor is different and engaging in that it actually covers the little things, the drama along with the joy, the frustration, the creativity and compromises that are struck up. And that it's also covering a Terry Gilliam making-of makes it all the more wild and funny. It's the first doc by the same directors of Lost in La Mancha, and I could tell a very similar style going on with how they pieced together footage, cut things up into segments, and even included little animations (detailing Brazil and Baron Munchausen's follies). It's almost like a test run for what they would later do with La Mancha, as here they're just trying to keep up with what everyone else is doing on the set.It's interesting too to see Gilliam with a lot of uncertainties with the picture, because when I first saw 12 Monkeys- and when I see it today- I'm struck by how accomplished and finely tuned and daring so much of it is, as it leaves you questioning yourself even, not just the movie itself. The doc is a little rough around the edges sometimes, and it doesn't have the full-on rush and unexpectedness of La Mancha. But there were some scenes here that I liked just as much as the best scenes in the other documentary, if not more so. The whole section regarding the test screening was the main one for me (and I've been to test screenings before), as the directors show a focus group, talking about a work of art like it was a toothpaste bottle or a buffalo; all the more ironic because Gilliam HAD final cut, but this was used really as leverage for the studio to add some fuel to their 'what the hell is this movie' fire. But to see overall the creative process at such a high volume here is quite entertaining, with the interviews with everyone- not just Gilliam- adding some light on 12 Monkeys, which I've seen many times, and given it just a little more context. Above average for a special-feature on a DVD, I'd say.

This documentary does a good job of showing the true face of the movie industry. It takes away all of the glamour and ease that many of general public attach to movie making.It is also put together exceptionally well. There are lots of shots that the existence of seems almost impossible.For those interested in what the film industry is really like - this is a very insightful documentary.

Rarely do you get to view the real behind the scenes of movie making. Most of the times these films are just lengthy pitches for the movie. The Hamster Factor tells its own story about the struggles of the director,producer, crew and less importantly the actors in bringing a finished product to the audience that will please everyone including the director who often has a separate and lofter vision than the producer.The balance is a delicate one, for if the audience isn't pleased then there will be no money for the next film.The only other memorable documentary of a movie that I can remember was the one by Mrs. Francis Ford Coppola documenting the making of Apocalypse Now. Wow! I considered it more dramatic than the movie.