Good movie but grossly overrated

There are better movies of two hours length. I loved the actress'performance.

The storyline feels a little thin and moth-eaten in parts but this sequel is plenty of fun.

It is neither dumb nor smart enough to be fun, and spends way too much time with its boring human characters.

What a waste. You know there's a long list of things that could define this movie as "low quality", but none of them would have mattered if they hadn't screwed up the ending. The story was pretty cool seeing as how I'm really into the whole "people mysteriously stuck in a room together and gotta find a way out before they die" type of genre. Seriously, I would have been willing to overlook all the negative aspects of this film and give it a much higher rating if it wasn't for the ending. I won't spoil the ending by telling you the details, but I will say this. The way they ended the movie pretty much negates the purpose of the whole movie. I mean seriously, there was absolutely no point in making this movie in the first place if you are gonna throw it in the trash with an ending that makes the rest of the film completely worthless. There is now only 1 way for this film to redeem itself. They need to make a sequel that explains more of whats going on and also give a character a chance to prove that the system that is responsible for all this is not invincible. If they don't do that, then this film will go down in history as a "do not watch under any circumstance" type of movie.

This movie starts off well enough but quickly fizzles into a chaos of frustration. The "dark" scenes are obviously faux in order for the viewer to see in the dark - even though there's nothing to see; so just making it true dark with sound would have been far more suspenseful. Even though the acting was quite good, this type of movie is supposed to be a thriller (put together the pieces and figure it out). True thrillers, by true masters like Hitchcock, give you all the clues and put them together in a way that you don't follow for a surprising twist at the end. However, they don't cheat by changing the rules of the universe they've created. Conversely, this movie totally cheats and changes the rules as it goes along. For instance it was easy to figure that Tanya being the final contestant (and as the tape says the most important), and also the least threatening, is the killer. However, they show her listening to a tape in the bathroom as if she's one of the contestants when in fact she's later revealed to be in on the experiment and a planted killer. So, why then would she need to listen to a tape by herself to explain what's going on? This is just lazy writing. I've written a book with far more twists and didn't have to resort to cheap tricks like this, so why couldn't the writers of this movie? The ending was also very disappointing, they go through the trouble of showing you the people perpetrating the torture but don't explain who they are or why; as such it would have been better if they just ended the movie five minutes earlier when Tanya turns out the light. Heck, the entire movie would have been worthwhile if Tanya (Ailsa Marshall) has shown her cans when she was stripping at the end but you don't even get that for closure (what "B" movie horror actress refuses to show nudity?) The movie is worth a watch but don't expect it to be anything new or to make any sense.

Tonya (Ailsa Marshall) is dumped naked into a room with thirteen strangers. She is player fourteen in a sadistic game where only the survivors win. With each player given clues and tools to survive, who will be left? And who is behind this? Not everyone tells the truth, so can the players trust each other to keep themselves civil? You're going to see review after review comparing this film to "Saw", and some comparing it to "Battle Royale"... still others referencing lesser known films. And, it's true, there's a "Saw" vibe here and a "Battle Royale" vibe... but don't let that dissuade you. There is nothing new about survival horror and it won't go away any time soon. And, if done correctly, that's not a bad thing.I've also seen certain comments concerning the low budget and overabundance of white light. I don't deny these aspects, but in complete honesty they didn't bother me one bit. As long as your film has an interesting story -- and this one does -- and isn't a complete shambles, you have me hook, line and sinker. My only issue with this film was that I had a very strong suspicion of the ending from the very beginning. I was even more convinced after a big clue was dropped in the interview scene.Fans of "Saw" will like this, as will people who like puzzles, so long as they keep an open mind and don't judge it strictly on its low budget and similarities to other films. I was thoroughly engaged by the interesting characters, destruction of film stereotypes, and ultimately the very clever writing inherent in the picture. Allegedly this film was thrown together roughly overnight, but it doesn't show.

This is a poor replica of saw . i didn't find it interesting ,not at all! I wonder why they still produce that kind of movies. it would be more interesting if it has commercial breaks. it starts almost the same as saw , it has no special effects at all except a broken camera and some blood scenes ,no intelligence , no plot ,no action ,just some people get killed , the lights go out someone is killed who is the killer . In my opinion (always) even with that so poor script it has no cohesion, the killer couldn't do the killings.The title of the movie is unrelated .what else can someone produce so wrong ? if i had the producer in frond of me and told me what will he produce , i would beat him just for the aesthetic point of view.the good part is that it has not so much screams as saw3, that was noisy!thats all.