Eye of the Beholder
January. 28,2000 RA reclusive surveillance expert is hired to spy on a mysterious blackmailer, who just may be a serial killer.
Similar titles
You May Also Like
Reviews
It's entirely possible that sending the audience out feeling lousy was intentional
This is one of the few movies I've ever seen where the whole audience broke into spontaneous, loud applause a third of the way in.
After playing with our expectations, this turns out to be a very different sort of film.
By the time the dramatic fireworks start popping off, each one feels earned.
CAUTION: POSSIBLE SPOILERSLongtime Ewan fan here, and this is one of the few movies of his that I actually did not like when I first saw it. It is EXTREMELY fast paced, and sometimes a bit far-fetched. How does the Eye remove his surveillance equipment so quickly once his subject is suddenly moving on to another life, another name, another identity???!!!In spite of what seem to be flaws, EYE OF THE BEHOLDER is an entrancing, haunting film about two people who don't know each other, but who are connected in ways that can't be imagined or understood until at least halfway thru the film.The Eye, a British surveillance specialist is sent by his boss to investigate the boss's son, who has been withdrawing a lot of cash from the bank. Boss wants to know what sonny is up to. The Eye is a professional, excellent with equipment, superb at watching without being noticed. It's clear he's been a spy for a very long time. That's why the former "farfetched" idea of him being able to pull microphones, knock down cameras, and slither from site to site without being found out turns out to be acceptable. His real name is Stephen Wilson, and his wife and daughter are gone, apparently because his work was more important to him than his family. After they left, The Eye realized what he lost, and when we meet him, he's been a lonely, isolated, damaged man for quite a while.The Eye locks on to the boss's son and discovers that the Embassy Brat has been giving money to a beautiful young woman. She meets the son of the boss at a museum in Washington D.C. and as she is captured by the Eye's camera, The Eye feels like he's seen a ghost. The story, and the obsession begin here. The Eye begins abandoning duty in favor of a sense of loyalty. Indeed it seems definite that The Eye has lost his sense of reason. His obsession with the murderous yet lovely woman grows as he follows her all around the country. Ashley Judd's many wigs and personalities are beautiful as they are astonishing. Do give this clever, suspenseful thriller a try. I think if you focus and follow the film, you will get it. It's a story of complete obsession and how obsession can really drive a person to do things they normally would not do, and how it can change them forever, for good or for bad.
This is one of my "great movies of all time". It just works. A father obsessed with a daughter, a daughter obsessed with a father, and the actors totally sold it. I read the book, and watched this numerous times and I can tell you, this is one of the few times a movie not only captured the spirit of the book but surpassed it. This movie is a testament to Ashley Judd and Ewan McGregor and their acting ability. I was on the edge of my chair the entire time I watched this movie. If I find this movie in the $5 bin anywhere I by all the copies because I can't exist in a world where this movie is placed beside B movies. Kudos to the director and everyone involved in this movie, you created a masterpiece.
This doesn't even deserve a star. Or even a zero. Or negative infinity. This is by far the worst film I have ever laid eyes on, and Ewan McGregor is one of my favourite actors. This was pedantic, pretentious, pontificating garbage void of a point. The direction is totally absent, the actors flail about on screen without purpose, and what the **** is k.d. lang doing in this???? What a stain on an otherwise brilliant career. If I were involved in the making of this film, I would be ashamed of myself. The only grace in knowing this exists is that one day the world will end and this film will be wiped from existence in the universe. It's THAT bad.
I hate whenever people say the book is better than the movie, but how can you argue that when one of the screenwriter's is the author? And the other is a director of an Oscar-nominated film Priscilla: Queen of the Desert? For a better answer to that watch the documentary about this film called Killing Priscilla for a better understanding and see how the film slowly slipped through Elliot's grasp. But that is for another criticism and this is for this film... The problem is not entirely Ashley Judd's fault. Nor is it Ewan McGregor's. But more exactly it is the fault of having both of them in the same film and portraying a father and daughter. If one is to take the pro-Judd choice in this film, then she does a exceptional portrayal of a lecherous woman that is conflicted with what she wants, and what she is trying to recapture due to the absence of her father in her past. Plus she gets naked too!!! Instantaneous high-fiving. Con-Judd though is that her character is too underdeveloped as far as her father abandonment issues and how her manipulation as a youth has transformed her into a woman that knows no love, only materialism. But she still is naked in the film and that is solidified! Now onto McGregor... pro-McGregor is this guy can channel isolation into depression and obsession just by raising his brow. He does it so void of any human emotion that he is a shell and his search of this woman, that may-or-may not be his daughter, seems to give him his sole soul that he has lacked for some time. Con-McGregor is the age of his character. If he is chasing a version of what would be his adult daughter then he has not aged a day since he quit the junk in Trainspotting. And that makes it the polarizing effect on this film... this film should've been separated into a 2 hour film where 1 hour was dedicated to the Ashley Judd character's point-of-view, and the other hour should've been dedicated to McGregor's version. Having both of them together interacting is breaking a cardinal rule of time travel which is DO NOT INTERACT with the past for it might throw off the universal balance, and that is exactly what has happened with the casting decision in this film. And one final time... Ashley Judd gets naked!!!