It's hard to see any effort in the film. There's no comedy to speak of, no real drama and, worst of all.

Amazing worth wacthing. So good. Biased but well made with many good points.

It is an exhilarating, distressing, funny and profound film, with one of the more memorable film scores in years,

The story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.

First a couple of things: 1. Despite what the box says the movie is only one hour long, a scant number of seconds over 60 minutes.2. Only two of experiments actually show up prior to the last two minutes of the movie.3. This is a rip off if you BUY the film since its nothing more than what should have been the pilot for the show. This should have been shown on TV as part of the show and not as a "movie".That said its not bad.Its a "movie" that does not work as a whole but in moments and in throw away lines and actions. It also had a great villain in what is the French Taunter from Holy Grail in hamster form.The plot, which is more like a hope than a real plot has Gantu being hired by the hamster to get the previous experiments and what happens as a result. There's a bit more to it then that but since its not much more I feel I have to leave something for you to find out on your own.As I said this is a movie of moments which is what you'll take away from this attack on your wallet by Disney. The moments, and there are many, will have you smiling, or laughing at there cleverness, a cleverness who's level is so high you'll wonder what the hell happened to the rest of the movie...Is this worth seeing? Yes, but rent it or borrow it, do not buy this.Will I see it again? On cable or TV.Frankly this is one of those things that should have worked but doesn't. Its annoying since its as if they had ideas but no idea how to string them into a viable plot...(then again its TV episodes) Allowing that the animation is by turns good, garbage or passable, one wonders if they had three levels of animators working on this each doing a different shot in turn.This is, on the whole, nowhere near as good as the real movie, who's ending it wipes away completely with talk that the sister and her boyfriend haven't dated, or that some of the events alluded to couldn't have happened in the stills simply because there are now the new creatures. Its as if a few weeks have passed since the end of the theatrical movie, not the year or so that is implied by the end stills.In pieces and on a level for unstained silliness this is the equal of the first film, but only in the quick moments that never gel.(This is not a ringing endorsement of the movie only that it should be seen in what ever way puts as little money in the coffers of the Disney company) and

Why did they have to make a sequel to Lilo and Stitch? This movie looked like the people spent a lot of time working on this. It looks like Stitch is just like a Pokemon. I can't wait until they come out with 626 experiment trading cards. I liked the evil little hamster that looked like a rabbit in this movie. I am still waiting for the day when Disney make a sequel that is better than the original movie!

This movie was about the worst of the Disney sequels. I've come to expect the next to crayon-drawing graphics, the total absence of background scenery, the complete loss of depth to the characters and the inane story lines from Disney sequels, but this one wins the old "Fickle Finger of Fate" award from Rowan & Martin's "Laugh-In."It was worse than all that. It was a major disappointment. It lost every inch of the charm the original had, and really was a monumental waste of my time and money in purchasing this lamoid piece of garbage.Stitch was as badly drawn as anything on a 5 year old's mother's refrigerator; worse even, as were the other characters, scenery, architecture and backdrops in this "animation." (when they bothered to ADD backdrops)This was such a disappointment, I was too mad at it to rate it until this late hour. (got it at 12:01 midnight last nite at WalMart)This movie seriously hurt my feelings. I loved Lilo and Stitch. Just loved it. I was SO disappointed. This "movie" rates a 0.00/10 from...the Fiend :.

Lilo & Stitch was wonderful! I put down my thoughts on that movie at Amazon, but as much as I enjoyed that movie & anticipated the sequel & series I knew were coming, I didn't hold out much hope. Let me tell you brother, I wasn't disappointed. Sure, I did my part to line Disney's pocket. Okay; here it is: Positives: An original story. Most all the voice talents reprise their roles. The artwork. Not-so-positives: Jason Scott Lee as David is noticeably missing. The artwork, like the story & humour is good, but it seems that perhaps there is some reliance on lightning striking twice. The music is the greatest disappointment; while 'not bad', it lacks the spunk & pizazz of the original. Worst of all, there is a great deal of reliance on old gags & old art; it's like somebody cut & pasted! All in all, this is not unlike the second Back to the future movie; feels like a stopgap fulfilment of a contractual obligation; the quality of the work is adequate to as remarkable as the archetype, but there is something lacking. Let's hope that like Bttf, the next installment meets or exceeds the expectations set by the original.